|
ABSTRACT
Background:
The objective is to study the relationship between
hypertension and cognitive/executive functions
in elderly Egyptians.
Method:
Case-control study.
Setting:
Outpatient clinics of Ain Shams University Hospital.
Participants:
One hundred and twenty elderly aged 60 years and
older divided into cases group (60 known hypertensive
subjects) and controls group (60 non hypertensive
subjects). Elderly with conditions affecting cognition
were excluded. Measurements: Comprehensive geriatric
assessment, blood pressure measurement, and cognitive/executive
tests including: Mini-Mental Status Examination
(MMSE), Block Design (BD), Digit Span Forward
(DSF), Digit Span Backward (DSB), Letter Verbal
Fluency (LVF), Animal Verbal Fluency (AVF), and
Contrasting Program (CP) tests.
Results: There
was no statistically significant difference between
hypertensive and non hypertensive subjects regarding
their performance in different cognitive/executive
tests (p > 0.05), but comparing the performance
of controlled hypertensives (28 subjects), uncontrolled
hypertensives (32 subjects), and non hypertensives
(60 subjects) as the three separate groups revealed
better performance among controlled hypertensives
and worse among uncontrolled hypertensives, especially
in the MMSE (P < 0.001), DSF (P < 0.001),
DSB (P = 0.024), LVF (P = 0.012), and CP (P <
0.001).
Conclusion:
Having uncontrolled hypertension is a risk for
worse cognitive\executive performance rather than
being hypertensive or not hypertensive.
Key words: Cognitive
functions, Executive functions, Elderly, Hypertension,
Egypt
|
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
INTRODUCTION
Cognitive functions are defined as the ability to think
and understand the world, and are divided into: Attention
(the ability to focus and sustain thought and perception);
Orientation to time and place; Memory, which involves
learning (registration) or recalling what has been learned;
Language function; Praxis (the ability to perform learned
motor tasks) and Executive functions(1). Executive function
is defined as the ability to plan, initiate, sequence,
monitor, and inhibit complex behavior(2). Another simple
definition of Executive functions is the ability to
plan one's behaviour to achieve a goal (3). The relationship
between hypertension (HTN) and cognitive/executive functions
is of growing interest because of the high prevalence
of both hypertension and cognitive/executive functions
decline in the elderly. In Egypt the prevalence of HTN
in the population was 26.3% in 1998. The prevalence
rate was 59.4% in the 65-74 years age group. HTN prevalence
increased progressively with age, with the exception
of the oldest age group >75 years. HTN highest prevalence
rate was in greater in the Cairo area (31.0%), and only
one third (37.5%) of all hypertensive individuals were
aware of their disease with an estimated number of hypertensive
individuals receiving pharmacological treatment in Egypt
of 23.9% and an estimated percentage of hypertensive
individuals whose blood pressure (BP) was under control,
of 8% (4). In a study conducted in seven geriatric centers
of the Egyptian ministry of health and population, it
was found that hypertension is the major health problem
of the elderly in Egypt (5). With the increase in life
expectancy in Egypt (71.8 year in 2008) (6) Egypt is
expected to have more elderly with hypertension in the
future.
The deleterious effect of HTN
on white matter and brain volume was reported by Raz
et al., (7) who reported that these effects are not
global, and they appear to be confined to the frontal
regions of the brain and more specifically to the prefrontal
cortex and the underlying white matter leading to cognitive
changes that suggest isolated vulnerability of some
executive functions to HTN. However other studies denied
any effect of HTN on cognitive/executive functions.(8)
Failure of identification of medically ill patients
with executive impairments has important clinical consequences,
as regards medication adherence, preservation of autonomy,
relapse prevention, post discharge placement, and potentiality
for rehabilitation.(2). Thus our aim was to study the
relationship between HTN and cognitive/executive functions
in elderly Egyptians.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Participants and study
design
A case-control study was conducted at Ain Shams University
Hospital's outpatient clinics on a sample of 120 subjects
(79 male and 41 female) with a mean age of (65.2 ±4.92)
years were eligible for the study. Eligible cases were
elderly aged >60 years who were known hypertensives.
Eligible controls were elderly aged >60 years who
were non-hypertensives. History and clinical examination
was done to all subjects to exclude conditions that
affected cognitive/executive functions as neuropsychiatric
disorders, cardiovascular diseases, alcoholism, drug
abuse, cognitive impairment or delirium.
Measurements
Blood pressure (BP) measurement was performed according
to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee
of Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment
of High Blood Pressure (JNC VII).(9) At least two measurements
were made. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) was defined
as the point at which the first of two or more sounds
is heard, and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) as the
point before the disappearance of sounds. Pulse pressure
(PP) was calculated by subtracting the DBP from the
SBP, while Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) was calculated
by summation of DBP and one third of the pulse pressure.(10)
Cognitive/executive functions were tested by a battery
of tests that included:
MMSE Arabic version(11), Block design test (BD), of
the Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised version
(WAIS-R) Arabic version(12), Digit span subtest-forward
(DSF) of the WAIS-R Arabic version(12), Digit span subtest-Backward
(DSB) Arabic version(12), Letter verbal fluency test
(LVF) (13), Animal (Category) verbal fluency test (AVF)
(14), Contrasting program test (CP) (15)
Statistical Analysis
Description of all data in the form of mean (M) and
standard deviation (SD) for quantitative variables was
done. Frequency and percentage was done for qualitative
variables. Comparison between quantitative variables
was done using t-test to compare two groups and ANOVA
(analysis of variance) to compare more than two groups.
Post Hoc test was done to detect the least significant
difference. Comparison of qualitative variables was
done using the Chi-square test.
ETHICS
This study had the approval of the ethics committee
of the Ain Shams Faculty of medicine. All subjects consented
(orally or written) to participation in the study
RESULTS
| Variables |
Case
|
Control
|
Test
|
P value
|
| Age |
mean ± SD
|
65.5 ± 5.2
|
64.8 ± 4.5
|
t = 0.3
|
0.40
|
| Gender |
|
|
|
X2=0.03
|
0.84
|
| Education |
|
Illiterate
|
|
Below high school
|
|
High school
|
|
Above high school
|
|
|
|
X2=3.37
|
0.33
|
| ADL |
|
Independent
|
|
Assisted
|
|
Dependant
|
|
|
|
X2=1.0
|
0.60
|
| IADL |
|
Independent
|
|
Assisted
|
|
Dependant
|
|
|
|
X2=3.0
|
0.22
|
| MMSE |
mean ± SD
|
28.6 ± 1.21
|
28.31 ± 1.4
|
t = 1.18
|
0.24
|
| BD |
mean ± SD
|
13.56 ± 8.36
|
12.71 ± 6.27
|
t = 0.62
|
0.53
|
| DSF |
mean ± SD
|
5.2 ± 0.98
|
5.25 ± 0.81
|
t =0.30
|
0.76
|
| DSB |
mean ± SD
|
2.68 ± 1.28
|
2.88 ± 0.92
|
t =0.98
|
0.32
|
| LVF |
mean ± SD
|
15.06 ± 3.88
|
14.51 ± 4.86
|
t =0.68
|
0.49
|
| AVF |
mean ± SD
|
9.7 ± 2.53
|
9.41 ± 2.26
|
t =1.23
|
0.52
|
| CP |
mean ± SD
|
8.71 ± 1.48
|
8.71 ± 1.42
|
t =0.00
|
1.0
|
*SD = Standard deviation.
ADL = Activities of daily living.
IADL = Instrumental activities of daily living.
§ MMSE = Mini Mental Status Examination.
BD = Block Design.
# DSF = Digit Span Forward.
** DSB = Digit Span Backward.
LVF = Letter Verbal Fluency.
AVF = Animal Verbal Fluency.
§§ CP = Contrasting program
Table 1: Description
and demography of cases and controls and mean scores
of cognitive/executive tests; MMSE, BD, DSF, DSB, LVF,
AVF, and CP
| Variables |
Controlled
Hypertensive
|
Uncontrolled
hypertensive
|
Non
hypertensive
|
P value
|
| SBP mean ±SD |
127.5 ± 8.44
|
160.47 ± 8.64
|
118±11.6
|
0.069
|
| DBP mean ±SD |
75.71 ± 6.34
|
89.22 ± 7.84
|
71.66 ± 7.63
|
0.48
|
| MAP mean ±SD |
101.42±6.78
|
125.15 ± 6.65
|
94.58±9.21
|
0.058
|
| PP mean ±SD |
51.78±7.72
|
71.25±10.39
|
46.5±7.98
|
0.159
|
| MMSE mean ±SD |
29.5±0.57
|
27.81±1.06
|
28.31±1.4
|
0.000
|
| BD mean ±SD |
21.85 ± 5.4
|
9.12±8.06
|
11.88±6.8
|
0.11
|
| DSF mean ±SD |
21.85 ± 5.4
|
4.84±1.16
|
5.25±0.81
|
0.000
|
| DSB mean ±SD |
3.5±0.74
|
1.96±1.2
|
2.88±0.922
|
0.024
|
| LVF mean ±SD |
18.67±2.78
|
13.59 ±3.55
|
14.28±4.614
|
0.012
|
| AVF mean ±SD |
10.96±2.44
|
8.59 ±2.07
|
9.41±2.26
|
0.687
|
| CP mean ±SD |
9.57±0.57
|
7.96 ±1.63
|
8.71±1.42
|
0.000
|
* SBP = Systolic Blood
Pressure.
SD = Standard deviation.
DBP = Diastolic Blood Pressure.
§MAP = Mean Arterial Pressure.
PP = Pulse Pressure.
# MMSE = Mini Mental Status Examination.
** BD = Block Design.
DSF = Digit Span Forward.
DSB = Digit Span Backward.
§§ LVF = Letter Verbal Fluency.
AVF = Animal Verbal Fluency.
# CP = Contrasting program
Table 2: Comparison between
controlled, uncontrolled hypertensive, and non hypertensive
subjects as regards their mean SBP, DBP, MAP, PP, and
the mean scores of the following tests; MMSE, BD, DSF,
DSB, LVF, AVF, and CP
There was no statistically significant difference between
cases and controls as regards age, gender, educational
level, and the performance in the Activity of Daily
Living (ADL) and the Instrumental Activity of Daily
Living (IADL) (P > 0.05) (Table 1), thus the effect
of HTN on cognitive/executive functions was easily studied
between the two groups independently of those variables.
Results revealed that cognitive/executive performance
did not show statistically significant difference between
the two groups (P > 0.05) in all cognitive/executive
tests (Table 1). As regards the results of hypertensive
subjects, they did not perform worse than the non hypertensive
(Table 2). The uncontrolled subjects performed much
worse than the controlled subjectss with a statistically
significant difference. The studied population was divided
into 3 groups: the controlled hypertensive, the uncontrolled
hypertensive, and the non hypertensive group. The comparison
between the 3 groups revealed that the controlled hypertensive
subjects had better scores in MMSE (P < 0.001), DSF
(P < 0.001), DSB (P = 0.024), LVF (P = 0.012), and
CP (P < 0.001) than the uncontrolled and the non
hypertensive (Table 2).
| Dependent
Variables |
BP
control
P-value
|
Treatment
category
P-value
|
Education
P-value
|
| SBP |
0.000
|
0.595
|
0.364
|
| MBP |
0.000
|
0.407
|
0.455
|
| PP |
0.000
|
0.608
|
0.803
|
| MMSE |
0.000
|
0.735
|
0.127
|
| BD |
0.000
|
0.005
|
0.001
|
| DSF |
0.018
|
0.042
|
0.592
|
| DSB |
0.000
|
0.082
|
0.006
|
| LVF |
0.010
|
0.388
|
0.000
|
| AVF |
0.090
|
0.067
|
0.000
|
| CP |
0.001
|
0.012
|
0.055
|
* SBP = Systolic Blood
Pressure.
SD = Standard deviation.
DBP = Diastolic Blood Pressure.
§MAP = Mean Arterial Pressure.
PP = Pulse Pressure.
# MMSE = Mini Mental Status Examination.
** BD = Block Design.
DSF = Digit Span Forward.
DSB = Digit Span Backward.
§§ LVF = Letter Verbal Fluency.
AVF = Animal Verbal Fluency.
# CP = Contrasting program
Table 3: Comparison of subjects
as regard BP control, treatment category, education,
blood pressure variables and cognitive executive test
When comparing BP control,
education treatment category and cognitive /executive
tests by ANOVA, BP control showed a statistically significant
relation with all tests: MMSE (P < 0.001), BD (P
< 0.001) DSF (P= 0.018), DSB (P < 0.001), LVF
(P = 0.01), CP (P = 0.001) except AVF (P = 0.09). Treatment
category showed significant relation with only BD (P
=0.005), DSF (P =0.042) and CP (P =0.012); Education
showed a statistically significant relation with all
cognitive/executive tests: BD (P = 0.001), DSB (P =
0.006), LVF (P < 0.001), CP (P = 0.05), AVF (P <
0.001) except MMSE (P = 0.12) and DSF (P=0.592) (Table
3).
DISCUSSION
HTN is the major health problem of elderly in Egypt.(5)
The association between HTN and the decline in the Cognitive/executive
functions was reported by several studies.(16,17) On
the other hand Posner et al.,(18) reported that HTN
is not associated with changes in memory, language or
general cognitive functions over time. The mechanisms
underlying HTN-related cognitive changes are complex
and are not yet fully understood.(19) so the purpose
of the study was to assess the relationship between
HTN and cognitive/executive functions in elderly. According
to the Research Committee of the American neuropsychiatric
association, there is no established golden test for
executive control function (ECF). This may be due to
three reasons. Firstly, the frontal lobe represents
so much of the brain's weight and surface area; it seems
unlikely that any one measure could assess its functions
comprehensively. Secondly, the frontal system has many
subcortical connections which are also relevant to ECF.
Finally, the ECF has an intimate relationship with other
cognitive functions. So, we are searching for an executive
battery, not an executive measure,(20) This statement
explains the diversity in literature discussing the
effect of HTN on cognitive/executive functions. This
could be due to the use of different cognitive/executive
tests, so we selected a battery of the cognitive/executive
tests: MMSE, BD, DSF, DSB, LVF, AVF, and CP.
Results revealed no statistically significant difference
between hypertensive and non hypertensive subjects as
regards cognitive/executive performance, but comparing
the studied population as 3 groups (controlled hypertensives,
uncontrolled hypertensives, and non hypertensives) revealed
that the controlled groups had better scores even than
the normal subjects. This finding raises the question
of why did the controlled hypertensive patients perform
better? There may be several possibilities. One of these
is; they had the ideal BP measurements for the best
cognitive/executive performance which in our study were
127.5±8.44 for SBP, 75.71±6.34 for DBP,
101.42±6.78 for MAP, and 51.78±7.72 for
PP. But in fact these readings did not differ significantly
from that of the uncontrolled; 160.47±8.64 for
SBP, 89.22±7.84 for DBP, 125.15±6.65 for
MAP, and 71.25±10.39 for PP; or the non hypertensive
ones; 118±11.6 for SPB, 71.66±7.63 for
DBP, 94.58±9.21 for MAP, and 46.5±7.98
for PP; thus this may be individualized; each person
may have his ideal BP measurements for better cognitive/executive
performance.
Another important possibility may be the effect of the
drugs used for BP control. ACE inhibitors were the most
antihypertensive drugs used by the controlled patients
(21 of the cases groups); who had the best cognitive/executive
performance. Literature shows that antihypertensive
that cross the blood brain barrier and affect the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
system (such as Captopril and Perindopril) control BP
and provide protection against cognitive decline.(21)
Also ACE inhibitors were found to be independently associated
with the stability of cognitive function and were a
protective factor for cognitive deterioration.(22) The
relationship between different BP components of subjects
and cognitive/executive tests showed that high SBP or
MAP or PP was associated with worse performance in almost
all tests. The DBP did not show such direct relation,
but it may have an indirect effect through the MAP or
PP. The specific cognitive functions affected by high
blood pressure have not yet been thoroughly or unequivocally
determined; however, high blood pressure is consistently
related to deficits in attention(23), learning and memory(24),
some visuospatial functions(25), and abstract reasoning
and other executive functions.(26, 27) Another factor
that might have influenced the performance of hypertensive
subjects was the educational level. A highly statistical
significant relation was found between having lower
level of education (illiterate, below high school) and
the worse performance in the following tests MMSE, BD,
DSB, LVF, AVF, and CP. Waldstein et al.,(28) assessed
attention, working memory, and executive function on
847 participants (503 men and 344 women), by using DSF
test, DSB test and Category Fluency test, she reported
that less-educated elderly, and non-medicated (with
anti-hypertensive drugs), cases were most vulnerable
to negative effects of hypertension on the selected
cognitive/executive tests. She also states that higher
levels of education and use of antihypertensive medications
may protect against the neurobiological consequences
of hypertension. Regarding the relationship between
education and cognitive/executive tests(29) she concluded
that a limited formal education is associated with less
cognitive function. Also(30) found that in elderly Egyptians
lack of education in early life enhanced later cognitive
decline. In Egypt the percentage of elderly above 65
years who have completed secondary education was 7.5%
in males and 2.8 % in females in 2005.(6)
Education has a marked effect on neuropsychological
test performance.(31) For example, the cutoff for "normal"
performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination may
vary by as much as eight points depending on the individual's
educational level.(32) Education specific normative
data are not available for most tests, and interpretation
of test results in individuals with unusually high or
low levels of education must be done with caution. (31)
In conclusion our study revealed that HTN per se may
not add to the burden of cognitive/executive dysfunction
when compared to non hypertension but the risk lies
in having high uncontrolled BP measurements. The conclusion
that each individual might have an individualized BP
measurement at which he/she performs better needs further
assessment and studying. Finally the use of ACE inhibitors
by hypertensive patients may have a beneficial effect
on cognitive/executive functions but can this be applied
on normal individuals? This needs still further investigation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors wish to thank study participants
and staff of Ain Shams University hospital for their
patience and help that made this study possible.
This study was supported by Ain Shams University Faculty
of medicine.
REFERENCES
[1] Beers M and Berkow
R (2000), eds. The Merck Manual of Geriatrics. 3rd ed.
Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck Research Laboratories
[2] Schillerstrom JE, Horton MS, Royall DR. (2005):
The impact of medical illness on executive function:
Psychogeriatrics; 46: 508-16..
[3] Rose J and Colombo M (2005): Neural Correlates of
Executive Control in the
Avian Brain PLoS Biol; 3(6): e190..
[4] Ibrahim M, (2001): Manual of hypertension. Egyptian
Hypertension Society, Cairo.
[5] Badr S, Mansour E, Salah M, Mohammed M (2005). Geriatric
health problems among attendants of the upgraded ministry
of health and population geriatric health care centers.
Reports of Egyptian ministry of health and population,
2005.
[6] Kinsella K and Wan H (2009): An Aging World: 2008.
U.S. Census
Bureau, International Population Reports, P95/09-1,
U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Pp
34, 105
[7] Raz N, Rodrigue K, Acker J. Hypertension and the
Brain: Vulnerability of the
Prefrontal Regions and Executive Functions. Behav Neurosci.2003;
117, 1169- 80.
[8] Morris MC, Scherr PA, Hebert LE, Glynn RJ, Bennett
DA, Evans DA. Association of Incident Alzheimer Disease
and Blood Pressure Measured From 13 Years Before to
2 Years After Diagnosis in a Large Community Study.
Arch Neurol. 2001; 58:1640-6.
[9] Chobanian A; Bakris G .; Black H; Cushman W; Green
L; Izzo, Jr J; Jones D; Materson B; Oparil S; Wright,
Jr J; Roccella E; the National High Blood Pressure Education
Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh Report of the
Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation,
and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension.
2003; 42: 1206-52.
[10] Ganong W. Review of medical physiology. Lange medical
publications. 21st ed
California,1998.
[11] El-Okl M. Prevalence of Alzheimer dementia and
other causes of dementia in Egyptian elderly. MD thesis,
Geriatrics Department, Ain Shams University library.2002.
[12] Melika L. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for adults
and adolescents. El-Nahda Egyptian library, Cairo 1991;
91:92-97-101.
[13] Gladsjo JA, Schuman CC, Evans JD, Peavy GM, Miller
SW, Heaton RK Norms for letter and category fluency:
demographic corrections for age, education, and ethnicity.
Assessment.1999;6:147-78.
[14] Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC, Hughes JP, van Belle
G, Fillenbaum G, Mellits ED, Clark C The Consortium
to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD).
Part I: clinical and neuropsychological assessment of
Alzheimer's disease. Neurology.1989; 39:1159-65.
[15] Stewart J. The frontal/subcortical dementias: Common
dementing illnesses associated with prominent and disturbing
behavioral changes. Geriatrics.2006; 61:23-7.
[16] Tzourio C, Dufouil C, Ducimetière P, Alpérovitch
A cognitive decline in individuals with high blood pressure,
A longitudinal study in the elderly: EVA Study Group.
Epidemiology of Vascular Aging. Neurology.1999; 53:
1948-52.
|