|
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
INTRODUCTION
Family caregivers of persons
with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders experience
high level of burden. Since de-institutionalisation
of the mentally ill, their relatives have been faced
with numerous and long lasting caring demands due to
the complex needs and problems especially of the chronic
ill (Moller-Lemkuhler, 2003).
In Iran
the number of schizophrenia patients returning to their
families after hospitalization increased in the 1990s.
It is estimated that 65%-75% of patients are living
with their families. Iranian families prefer to keep
patients in the family (Khodabakhshi koolaee, 2008).
Taking care of a patient with schizophrenia and other
mental illness has been shown to place a significant
burden on the caring families (Khodabakhshi koolaee
& Etemadi, 2009).
The research indicates that the caregivers experience
reduction of well-being, restrictions in leisure time,
daily routine and social contacts, and emotional problems
(Kuipers, 1993; Provencher, 1996). Furthermore, the
families or caregivers must cope with the stress of
the patient's disruptive symptoms, changes in household
routines, strained social relations within the family,
loss of social support, diminishing opportunities for
leisure time and deteriorating finances (Stengard, 2003).
If the caregivers are in their old age, the problems
and stress due to caring for the patients will be in
high levels. Moreover, the elderly caregivers always
ask themselves, who will care for their patients when
they are not there. Although, some research was done
on the effects of care giving of psychotic patients,
most studies did not include older caregivers and the
mental health problems they encountered.
To our knowledge this is the first study in which such
a comprehensive assessment of care giving outcome of
the elderly caregivers has been performed in Iran. Therefore,
the present study was undertaken to examine this hypothesis:
Is the mental health of the elderly caregivers affected
by caring for schizophrenia patients?
METHODS
Subjects:
Patients who lived with a parent were informed and then
50 caregivers who were eligible to participate were
selected for study. 45 of them were mothers and 5 of
them were fathers. The mean age was 65. Other criteria
of selection of patients and parents are listed as follows:
a) They were living with and caring for one child with
a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia, according to criteria
of the DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 2000).
b) They were aged 60 years and above.
c) They were able to read and write Persian.
d) They had the same social-economic status (SES).
e) They wrote the consent letter to participate in research.
f) Parents with a schizophrenic child and no other mental
illness, and the duration of the schizophrenia was 3
years or less at the time of recruitment were included.
Parents were excluded if:
a) They had a diagnosis of psychotic disorders like
delusional disorders or schizophrenia and so on;
b) They cared for more than family member with chronic
physical or mental illness;
c) They had been the primary carer for less than 3 months.
Measure:
The participants completed General Health Questionnaire
(GHQ) Persian version. The General Health Questionnaire-28
is frequently used as an indicator of psychological
Well-being and this latter construct resembles the psychological
dimension of quality of life (Goldberg and Hillier 1979,
Sanderman and Stewart 1990, EURIDISS 1990, Krol et al.
1994). The GHQ as a self-report instrument was designed
for detection and assessment of individuals with an
increased likelihood of current psychiatric disorder
(Goldberg and Hillier 1979, McDowell and Newell 1987,
Goldberg and Williams 1988). The original questionnaire
consists of 60 items from which shorter versions of
30, 28, 20 and 12 items were developed. The GHQ-28 scale
was derived by factor analysis of the original 60-item
version and prepared mainly for research purposes. However,
as already mentioned, the scale is often used as a measure
of psychological well-being also (Goldberg and Williams
1988, EURIDISS 1990, Krol et al. 1994). The GHQ-28 incorporates
four subscales: somatic symptoms, anxiety and insomnia,
social dysfunction, and severe depression. The existence
of four subscales permits analyses within the subscales
and this is an additional advantage of the GHQ-28 scale
over the other versions (Goldberg and Hillier 1979,
Bowling 1992). For each item four answer possibilities
are available (1-not at all, 2-no more than usual, 3-rather
more than usual, 4-much more than usual). In the study
the Likert scoring procedure (1, 2, 3, and 4) is applied
and the total scale score ranges from 28 to 112. The
higher the score is the poorer the psychological well-being
of the patient (Nagyova, 2000). In 1996 this questionnaire
translated to Persian by Hooman and Reliability analysis
showed satisfactory result (Cronbach's alpha coefficient
= 0.84). In addition, in other study reliability measured
again and the results indicated satisfactory result
(Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.87) khodabakhshi koolaee
(2006). In this study, use the Persian version.
In addition, the participants completed a socio-demographic
data sheet. Also, the psychiatric records of patients
were studied.
Statistical analysis:
Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample
characteristics and the results from each scale. Analyses
were preformed with SPSS 11.5 for windows.
RESULTS
The socio-demographic characteristics
of caregivers and patients were summarized (Table 1).
|
CHARACTERISTIC
|
|
Caregivers Age - group, n
(%)
|
| 60-65
years |
17(34%)
|
| 65-70
years |
14 (28%)
|
| 70-75
years |
12 (24%)
|
| 75
years and above |
7(14%)
|
|
|
Educational Level, n(%)
|
|
Primary school
|
20(40%)
|
|
Secondary school
|
22 (44%)
|
|
University orabove
|
28 (16%)
|
|
|
Gender, n (%)
|
| Female |
45(90%)
|
| Male |
5(10%)
|
|
|
Marital status, n (%)
|
| Married |
23(46%)
|
| Divorced |
7(14%)
|
| Widow/widower |
20(40%)
|
|
|
Patient's gender, n (%)
|
| Male |
35(70%)
|
| Female |
15 (30%)
|
|
|
Age group, n (%)
|
| 20-29 years |
14(28%)
|
| 39-39 years |
28(56%)
|
| 40 and above |
8(16%)
|
|
|
Educational level, n (%)
|
| Secondary school |
12(24%)
|
| Diploma |
22(44%)
|
| University or above |
16(32%)
|
|
|
Marital status, n (%)
|
| Single (never married) |
32(64%)
|
| Divorced |
18(36%)
|
|
|
Vocational status, (%)
|
| Unemployed |
42(84%)
|
| Employeee |
8(16%)
|
|
|
Medical condition in the
preceding 3 months, n (%)
|
| Improved |
9(18%)
|
| Stable |
35(70%)
|
| Worsened, unstable |
6(12%)
|
|
Table
1: Socio- demographic Characteristic of mothers and
patients in study all of participants
Data were calculated of
the GHQ & all GHQ subscales questionnaire Ttable2).
20 out of all participants reported social dysfunction.
In addition, 12 out of all subjects said they had sleep
disturbance and 12 out of all participant reported the
somatic symptoms and they are met physician and using
drugs. Furthermore, 10 out of them reported the high
depression and met psychiatrist every month for treatment.
| Variable (GHQ subscales) |
Frequency
|
Percent
|
| Somatic symptoms |
12
|
24%
|
| Anxiety and insomnia |
12
|
24%
|
| Social dysfunction |
20
|
40%
|
| Severe depression |
10
|
20%
|
Table 2: The frequency and
percent of GHQ subscales among participants
38 subjects
out of 50 participants had acquired low mental health
(76% of the parents report disturbance in their mental
health, (Table 3).
| Variable |
Frequency |
Percent |
| Total score of GHQ |
38 |
76% |
Table 3: The frequency and
percent of total score of GHQ among participants
DISCUSSION
The results indicted
that 76% of the older caregivers reported low mental
health. Care giving of psychiatric patients can take
a heavy toll on caregivers. Indeed, when the caregivers
were in old age the stress of caring patients were doubled.
Older caregivers said that they must deal with psychotic
symptoms of their patients every day and tried to solve
them.
On the other hand, Iranian parents are regarded to emotionally
over involvement attitude toward their patients. Parents
who had high expressed emotion (EE) with emotional over
involvement (EOI) were very self - blamer and more controlling
than other parents (khodabakhshi Koolaee, 2009). They
always tried to control all of things in their life,
so they more encountered stress.
Burden was significantly associated with several psychosocial
resources and dispositions of the relatives (Moller-Lemkuhler,
2005).
The present findings shed additional light on the relatives
of the elderly caregiver's burden. First, parents report
that overwhelming anxiety and lack of knowledge about
how to go about planning were the biggest personal barriers
they faced. Second, of importance also were financial
limitations and lack of understanding about the best
ways for accessing services.
In general, in response to the stress of caring, a variety
of comprehensive family interventions for patients and
their families has been developed.
Falloon(2003) discussed the aims of the family interventions
are enhance the care giving capacity of family members
and other people involved in the day to day care for
people with mental disorders have a clinically significant
impact on the course of major mental disorders. Also,
Falloon (2003) reported that the best results appear
to be associated with comprehensive a methods that integrate
carers into the therapeutic team through education and
training in stress management strategies, with continued
professional support and supervision over a period of
at least two years. Benefits from family approaches
are also evident for the carers themselves, with reduced
stress associated with their care giving roles.
Moreover, Hatfield (2003) provided a four hour workshop
was designed to take caregivers step by step theory
and planning process. 1) An overview of the planning
process (caregivers are encouraged to identify kinds
of resistance that may be preventing them from tackling
the issue of future planning. 2) learning about community
recourses (representatives from the fields of mental
health, aging, and social services. 3) developing trusts
and wills(Hatfield, 2003).
As falloon (2003) said, almost all patients have somebody
who cares for them, or at least somebody who cares about
them. With improved understanding and straightforward
training in problem solving approaches caregivers can
provide a substantial additional resource to the therapeutic
team, a resource that promises to contribute to long-term
clinical and social recovery from major disorders.
REFERENCES
Bowling A. (1992). Measuring
health: A review of quality of life measurement scales.
Open University Press: Milton Keynes. Philadelphia.
European Research on Incapacitating Diseases and Social
Support (EURIDISS). (1990). International Journal of
Health Sci;1:217-28.
Falloon, I. R. H. (2003). Family interventions for mental
disorders: efficacy and effectiveness. World Psychiatry,
2, pp: 20-28.
Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. (1979). A scaled version of
the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine,
;9:139-45.
Goldberg D, Williams P. (1988). A user's guide to the
General Health Questionnaire, NFER NELSON Publishing
Company Ltd. Windsor.
Hatfield, A. B. (2003). The older caregivers quandary
care when was not there? The Journal of families &
mental health illness, 11: PP: 10-14.
Hooman, A. (1996). General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28):
psychometric evaluation in Iran. Unprinted M.A thesis.
Tarbiat Moelam University. Tehran- Iran.
Khodabakhshi, Koolaee. A. (2006). The comparison &
relationship between family function and mental health
in runaway "and Non-runaway Adolescents",
Counseling Research and developments. Quarterly Journal
of Iranian Association.vol.4, No.16.PP: 25-45.
Khodabakhshi Koolaee, A. (2008). Gender Differences
in Expressed Emotion in Families of Persons with Schizophrenia:
A study in Iran, The paper presented in: 10th international
interdisciplinary congress on women Madrid, Spain. 3-9,
July 2008.
Khodabakhshi Koolaee, A. (2009).Expressed Emotion: It
is cross-culturally psychological construct? The study
in Iran, US-China Education Review, 6; PP: 54-57.
Khodabakhshi koolaee, A, and Etemadi, A. (2009). The
outcome of family interventions for the mothers of schizophrenia
patients in Iran, International Journal Of social Psychiatry,
pp: 1741-2854.
Krol B, Sanderman R, Moum T, Suurmeijer T, Doeglas D,
Krijnen W,Robinson I, Briançon S, Bjelle A, Heuvel
van den W.(1994). A comparison of the General Health
Questionnaire-28 between patients with rheumatoid arthritis
from The Netherlands, France, Sweden, and Norway. Eur
J Psychol Assess; 10:93-101.
Kuipers, L. (1993). Family burden in schizophrenia:
implications for services. Social psychiatry epidemiology
28:207-210.
McDowell I, Newell C. (1987). Measuring Health. New
York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moller- Leimkuhler, A.M. (2003). Burden of relatives
and predictors of burden: Baseline results from the
Munich 5-year-follow-up study on relatives of first
hospitalization patients with schizophrenia or depression.
Eur Arch Psyciatry Cli Neuosci, 255:223-231.
Nagyova,I.(2000).General Health Questionnaire-28: psychometric
evaluation of the Slovak version. Studia Psychologic
, 42, 4, PP: 351-61.
Provencher, H.L. (1996). Objective burden among primary
caregivers of persons with chronic schizophrenia. Journal
of psychiatry mental health nursing 3: 181-187.
Sanderman R, Stewart R. (1990). The assessment of psychological
distress: Psychometric properties of the General Health
Questionnaire (GHQ). Int J Health Sci; 1:195-202.
Stengard, E. (2003). Educational intervention for the
relatives of schizophrenia patients in Finland. Nord
Journal Psychiatry, 57:271-277.
|