The status of Charitable Health Organizations in Some Islamic countries

Author:
Dr. Seyedvahid Hosseini1, Dr. Leila Malekmakan2, Dr. Sezaneh Haghpanah3

1. Vice Chancellor for clinical Affaires of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
2. Member of Shiraz Nephro-urology research center in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
3. Director of health system research of vice chancellor for clinical affairs of Shiraz university of medical sciences


ABSTRACT:

International charitable work fills critical gaps in the global socioeconomic infrastructure . Governmental organizations alone can not solve every social problem, without international charity , more people in the world would die of hunger , disease and live in poverty .In this paper we study the situation of some charities in Islamic countries .
In Kuwait, International Islamic charitable organization (IICO) has branches and offices all over the state. Their strategy is to present an Islamic model of integrated modern charitable work . More than sixty countries around the world are benefiting from IICO charitable work (Such as Jordan, Uganda, Nigeria, Niger, Benin, Comoros Islands and Sudan). In Bangladesh, NGOs play a significant role in PHC provision in rural and urban areas. Several hundred indigenous NGOs have been active in health and development since the country's independence in 1971. In Palestine, in addition to the public health services available , and those provided by charitable and voluntary organizations , the main providers of health care for the population are the Palestinian Red Crescent Society and other NGOs. In Iran, currently, there are also a large number of health facilities, ranging from out patient clinics to hospitals and institutions, run by charitable community groups. Finally considering the successful pattern and strength points of the charities in other countries, especially Islamic countries, help us to promote the status of charity service delivery to the community.



Introduction:

International charitable work fills critical gaps in the global socioeconomic infrastructure. Governments alone cannot solve every social problem. Businesses alone cannot meet every economic need. Without international charity, more people in the world would die of hunger and disease, fewer children would learn to read and write, and more people would live in poverty. There would be more environmental destruction and fewer scientific advances(1).

The use of private health care providers in low and middle income countries (LMIC) is wide spread and its implications are the subject of continuing debate. One view is that private providers are likely to be more efficient than the public sector and hence that government should contract out services to the private sector. An alternative view is that private providers are often not superior in quality or efficiency to the public sector, and that contracts are not straightforward to design and implement. Finally, there is increasing recognition that neither public nor private providers have uniform characteristics, and that this distinction might overlook more important issues, such as the extent to which a provider uses public funds efficiently and serves the goals of public health(2). The range of charitable services provided is extensive-medical care, food, agricultural training, disaster relief, shelter, education, clothing, water, professional exchanges, and support of human rights and civil liberties.

Each charitable organization must safeguard its relationship with the communities it serves in order to deliver effective programs. This relationship is founded on local understanding and acceptance of the independence of the charitable organization. If this foundation is shaken, the organization's ability to be of assistance and the safety of those delivering assistance is at serious risk(1). A lack of standards in healthcare organizations often makes it difficult to consistently define and report charity care. Accurately documenting services provided to patients who are unwilling or unable to pay can be difficult for many organizations(3). Nowadays we see increasing urgent needs in poor societies especially in Moslem countries and communities where poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, disease, famine and other difficult situations are persisting. In this paper we study the situation of some charities in Islamic countries.


Kuwait

IICO (International Islamic Charitable Organization) is an independent non-political organization which offers a wide range of pure humanitarian services, that was established in Kuwait. IICO was founded to meet the increasing urgent needs in poor societies especially in Moslem countries and communities where poverty, illiteracy, unemployment, diseases, famine, and other difficult situations are persisting.

IICO has established several committees to provide aid in various fields. Each of these committees is specialized in a specific field or serving a geographical area or a particular group of people. The first of these was the Committee of Asia. That is one of the IICO's largest committees, serving 825 million Muslims in Asia. The objective of this committee is helping the needy in the Asian continent, since they represent the largest Muslim community in the world (three quarters of the world Muslims). More than sixty countries around the world are benefiting from IICO's charitable work whether Muslim population is a majority or a minority(4).


Bangladesh

NGOs play a significant role in PHC provision in rural Bangladesh, and they provide most of these services in urban areas. Under the Government of Bangladesh's 5-year Health and Population Sector Programme (HPSP) the overall objective was to improve the health of the population. The Bangladesh Population and Health Consortium (BPHC) agency, which delivers maternal and child health (MCH) and family planning services in rural areas, was established by the British Overseas Development Administration (ODA). From 1998-2003, the UK Department for International Development (DFID) funded BPHC to develop government NGO collaboration in the sector and deliver ESP services through partner NGOs in a Public-NGO Partnership (PNP). This was to be an integral part of the sectoral programme, jointly managed by DFID and the Line Director for ESP-Reproductive Health in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW).

In the PNP phase, BPHC invited NGOs, to bid for funds to deliver ESP services in areas agreed upon with the government health managers. The MOHFW Line Director was informed of the procedures and arrangements for a transparent selection process, which was implemented by BPHC in 2000. This included visits and interviews with NGO managers, separate financial and technical proposals, and assessment and scoring of these by BPHC and external reviewers. The emphasis was on BPHC supporting the NGOs to provide an expanded range of services consistent with the government ESP, developing government-NGO collaboration and demonstrating the impact of NGO service delivery(5).


Palestine

Because of the dispersal of the Palestinian people across different areas and as a result of the lack of a unified political authority, there are no unified health policies and strategies; rather, the various bodies providing services have their own characteristics. The main providers of health care for the Palestinian population are the Palestinian Red Crescent Society and other Palestinian NGOs and UNRWA. UNRWA's policy is to provide essential health services to eligible Palestinian refugees, consistent with the humanitarian policies of the United Nations and the basic principles and concepts of the WHO.

UNRWA's health system is based on three levels. At the primary level, outpatient services are provided through UNRWA's facilities-general and special care clinics, laboratories and dental clinics, which are integrated at health centre level. At the secondary level, referral and support services comprise inpatient care at subsidized hospitals, as well as specialist and rehabilitative care and other basic support services through contractual arrangements or individual patient subsidies. At the tertiary level, UNRWA provides partial individual patient subsidies for emergency life-saving treatment at the specialized health institutions available in the area of operations, provided this does not involve long-term commitment(6).


Islamic Republic of Iran

Although the NGO movement in its modern sense is relatively new to Iran and most of the active NGOs are closely associated with the government, there is a long tradition of voluntary participation in financing, organization and provision of health services as charitable acts. In fact many of the famous hospitals and health centers established early in the century owe their existence to such charitable organizations predating the established of the MOH&ME. Currently too there are a large number of health facilities, ranging from outpatient clinics to hospitals and institutions run by the charitable community groups.
Among the NGOs established over the past few years a considerable number are concerned with health problems related to specific groups like Thalassaemic children. The Family Planning Association of Iran is probably the largest while numerous small NGOs are active in the area of drug prevention and supporting people with HIV/AIDS. The semi-
military youth organization of Basij affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards Army is also an important health-related NGO because of its enormous contribution to the periodic mass mobilization in support of public health interventions like immunization campaigns. Likewise, although not organized as an NGO, the enormous corps of the Women Health Volunteers may also be viewed as an NGO. Due to the supportive stance on NGOs and other forms of civil society participation of the President Khatami, NGO movement has received a greater attention from the UN agencies over the past few years(7).


Discussion

While the civil society sector is a sizable force in a wide range of countries, there are considerable differences among countries. The civil society organization workforce in the developed countries is more than three times larger than that in the developing countries. The relatively limited presence of civil society organizations in the developing countries does not, of course, necessarily mean the absence of helping relationships in these countries.

Countries vary in the extent to which these organizations rely on paid as opposed to volunteer workers. Thus, while volunteers comprise 43 percent of the civil society workforce overall, reliance on volunteers varies considerably among countries-from a low of under 10 percent in Egypt to a high of over 75 percent in Sweden and Tanzania, and averages 38 percent among the countries we have examined. Surprisingly, however, no systematic difference exists between developed and developing countries along this dimension. Since the developed countries also have larger paid nonprofit employment, this suggests that the presence of paid nonprofit employment does not displace volunteers, as is sometimes alleged. This pattern reflects the long history of social movements in these countries coupled with the role that the state has assumed as both a provider and financier of social welfare services, something that is far less in evidence in other countries, including many so-called European "welfare states." To understand this more fully, it is useful to turn from this overview of the size of the civil society sector to an analysis of its composition(8-10). Charitable organizations have vast experience in overcoming the difficulties associated with carrying out charitable work in distant lands. Some challenges are merely inconvenient: language barriers, cultural differences, technological limitations. Charitable organizations have successfully addressed these challenges through attention to procedures designed to reduce the risk that charitable assets would be used for non-charitable purposes(1).

In many low-income countries, NGOs support research activities and deliver basic health services in particular areas or among certain populations. Their effectiveness in establishing sustainable primary health care systems has been linked with promotion of community participation, having close links with the poor, being flexible and having committed staff.

The comparative advantage of NGOs might be assessed in terms of efficiency, innovation, quality of services, ability to mobilize resources, contribution to the sustainability of the local health system and coverage of grass-roots communities(5,11).

Charitable organizations must exclusively pursue the charitable purposes for which they were organized and chartered. The mission of an organization defines its purpose, its program activities, its values and operations, and the measures of its success. Finally considering the successful pattern and strong points of the charities in other countries, especially Islamic countries, helps us to promote the status of charity service delivery to the community.

 

References

  1. Buchanan R. Principles of International Charity Developed by the Treasury Guidelines Working Group of Charitable Sector Organizations and Advisors March 2005.Available at: www.ombwatch.org/npa/ Treasury%20Principles%20Final%20Document%20pdf
  2. Palmer, N.; Mills, A.; Wadee, H.; Gilson, L.; Schneider, H. Policy and Practice:A new face for private providers in developing countries: what implications for public health? Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003, 81 (4) : 292-297.
  3. Lefton RB. Developing organizational charity-care policies and procedures. Healthc Financ Manage.2002Apr;56(4):52-7.
  4. International Islamic Charitable organization (IICO). Available at: http://www.iico.org/home-page-eng/index-eng.htm
  5. MERCER A, HOSSAIN KHAN M, DAULATUZZAMAN M, REID J. Effectiveness of an NGO primary health care programme in rural Bangladesh: evidence from the management information system. Health Policy Plan. 2004; 19(4):187-198.
  6. The Palestinian Population. www.emro.who.int/mnh/whd/CountryProfile
  7. Country Cooperation Strategy for World Health Organization and Islamic Republic of Iran.www.emro.who.int/iran/media/pdf/Iran-CCS.pdf
  8. Salamon LM, Sokolowski SW.Global Civil Society An Overview. Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project.
    Available at: www.jhu.edu/~ccss/pubs/pdf/globalciv.pdf
  9. Reid EJ and Kerlin JA.International Understanding, International Development and Assistance,and International Affairs. Available at:
    www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411276_nonprofit_subsector.pdf
  10. Tuan T, Dung VT, Neu I, Dibley MJ. Comparative quality of private and public health services in rural Vietnam. Health Policy Plan.2005;20(5):319-27.
  11. Porter JD,Ogden JA,Rao PV,Rajesh D,Buskade RA and Soutar D.Introducing operations research into management and policy practices of a NGO.a partnership between an Indian leprosy NGO and an international academic institution.Health Policy Plan.200;19:80-7.