|
Hamid
Namazi,MD
Assistant professor Of Orthopaedic Surgery Department
Mohammad
Jafar Emami,MD
Associate Professor Of Orthopaedic Surgery Department
Ahmad
Ensafdaran,MD
Assistant Professor Of Orthopaedic Surgery Department
Department of Orthopaedic
surgery Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Correspondence:
Dr. M.J. Emami
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Chamran Hospital
Shiraz- IRAN
Fax: +98 711-6231409
Tel: =+98 711-6246093- 6231410
Box: 71345
E- mail: namazih@sums.ac.ir
|
|
ABSTRACT
Background:
Because the numbers of hip fractures worldwide
are projected to increase, osteoporosis will
become an increasing burden on the health care
system, in addition to causing pain, disability
and reducing quality of life.
Mortality rate of hip
fracture is 15-20% as compared to 0.91% of other
orthopaedic problems.
Objective:
To determine the hip bone mineral density level
that is predictive of fracture and whether osteoporosis
is more prevalent in patients with hip fracture
than in the age-and sex-matched group or not.
Method:
In this prospective study the hip bone mineral
density of 100 patients (50 men, 50 women) and
100 control individuals (50 men, 50 women) between
50-90 years old was measured by Dual-energy
x-ray absorptiometry. The patients group had
hip fracture after minor trauma .The statistical
analysis of the two groups was done by t-test.
Results:
This study showed that bone mineral density
in the patient group was 0.6333 gr/cm2
versus 0.7589 gr/cm2 in the control
group. The mean Z-score in the patient group
was -1.218 versus -0.652 in the control group.
The mean T-score in the patient group was -2.98
versus -1.98 in the control group. So hip fracture
is associated with osteoporosis, which is more
prevalent in the patient group than in the age-and
sex-matched control group.
Conclusion:
We recommend every person who has been screened
by DXA and having bone density below 0.6333
gr/cm2 is prone to hip fracture.
Also regular annual follow up by DXA is required
until BMD reaches at least above 0.6333 gr/cm2.
Key
words: Bone mineral density, Dual-energy
x-ray absorptiometry, Hip fracture.
|
Introduction
The
incidence of hip fracture has increased in recent
years. Approximately 40 percent of women will experience
one or more fractures after the age of 50(1).
At 50 years of age for women the lifetime risk of
hip fracture is 17.5%(2). Mortality rate
of hip fracture is 15-20% as compared to 0.92% mortality
of other orthopaedic problems(3). Patients
with hip fracture have risk of complications such
as deep vein thrombosis, bed sores, UTI, etc(4).
Osteoporosis is the single most important risk factor(5).
There are several techniques such as Radiographic
absorptiometry, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry,
Quantitative CT, Ultrasonography, etc, that detect
osteoporosis but Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
is the current gold standard method(6, 7).
We have conducted this study to detect the severity
of osteoporosis and to determine the level of bone
mineral density that guides us to start preventive
therapy of hip fractures.
Patients and Methods
This is a prospective study
in which hip bone mineral density was measured by
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in 100 patients (50
men, 50 women) who had hip fracture after minor trauma.
All 100 patients were evaluated by Dual -energy X-ray
absorptiometry within 2 weeks after fracture. The
age of patients was between 50 and 90 years. Bone
mineral density measurement was done on the side that
had no fracture.
The control group consisted of 100 persons (50 men,
50 women) between 50 and 90 years old in whom bone
mineral density of hip was measured by Dual-energy
x-ray absorptiometry.
We excluded the following
patients1-Patients with metabolic bone diseases.
2-Patients who had old fracture of more than 2 weeks
duration.
3-Patients who had previous osteoporosis due to drug
consumption.
4-Patients who had major trauma.
5-Patients who had a history of previous fracture
or surgery on the other hip.
Each person had three sets of data:
Bone Mineral density (BMD),
T- score, Z- score
1- BMD that is mineral content of bone and recorded
in gr/cm2
2- T-score that compares BMD of each person with young
person.
3-Z-score that compares BMD of each person with age-
matched persons.
After collection of all data, by comparing the patient
group with the control group, T- test analysis was
done and then results were reported.
Results
The mean age in the patient
group was 70 years (S.D: 10.3) and in the control
group was 68 years (SD: 8.82). The statistical analysis
revealed no difference between the two groups in terms
of age ( P.value=0.342). The mean bone mineral density
in the patient group was significantly lower than
the control group, being 0.6333 gr/cm2
(min: 0.345, max: 1, S.D:0.126) versus 0.7589 gr/cm2
(min: 0.441, max: 1.099, SD: 0.144) (P.value=0) (Table
1). The mean T score in the patient group was significantly
lower than the control group, being - 2.986 (min:
1.2, max: 4.7, S.D: 1.109) versus - 1.98(min: 0.1,
max: 4.5, S.D: 1.17) (P. value= 0) (Table 2). The
mean Z- score in the patient group was significantly
lower than the control group, being-1.218 (S.D: 0.769)
versus- 0.652 (S.D: 0.983) (P.value= 0.002) (Table
3).
| Table
1 : BMD in patients and control groups |
| |
Number
of cases |
Mean
age (y/o) |
BMD
(gr/cm2 |
| Control
group |
100 |
68 |
0.7589 |
| Patients
group |
100 |
70 |
0.6333 |
| Table
2: T.score in patients and control groups |
|
|
Number
of cases |
Mean age (y/o)
|
T-
score (S.D) |
|
Control group
|
100
|
68
|
-1.98 |
|
Patients group
|
100
|
70
|
-2.98 |
| Table
3: Z-score in patients and control groups |
|
|
Number of cases
|
Mean age (y/o)
|
Z-
score (S.D) |
|
Control group
|
100
|
68
|
-0.652 |
|
Patients group
|
100
|
70
|
-1.218 |
Discussion
Because the number of hip
fractures are projected to increase, osteoporosis
will become an increasing burden on the health care
system, in addition to causing pain, disability and
reducing quality of life(8). Perhaps the
major value of bone densitometry in current orthopaedic
practice is identification of the patients with osteoporosis
who are at increased risk for fracture(9).
Whether osteoporosis is more
prevalent in patients with hip fracture than age and
sex-matched groups has remained controversial. Makin
in 1987 could not confirm that the degree of osteoporosis
is related to the incidence of femoral neck fractures.
He concluded that the incidence of proximal femoral
fractures is related to other factors in addition
to the degree of osteoporosis(10). In a
few studies osteoporosis has not been shown to be
more prevalent in those with hip fractures than in
age -matched controls(11). But Atkin in
1984 demonstrated that patients with hip fractures
often have bone that is more osteoporotic than that
of age and sex- matched control subjects(12).
Barth and colleagues measured osteon dimensions and
numbers in cortical bone specimens obtained from the
medial femoral cortex in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty
for femoral neck fracture. They compared these measurements
to those of 12 age-matched cadavers without fractures.
There were fewer osteons per unit area and the osteon
haversian canals were larger in the fracture group
than in the control group(13). In our study
we found that the patients with hip fracture often
have bone that is more osteoporotic than the age-
and sex- matched control group (BMD). In the patient
group it was 0.1256 gr/cm2 lower than the control
group). 0.6333 gr/cm2 is the level of hip
bone mineral density that has an essential risk for
hip fracture and needs an aggressive prophylactic
therapy for osteoporosis. Also it enables us to find
out whether after treatment, the patient has any improvement
in bone mass or not. So the physician can effectively
follow the effect of treatment and also the duration
of prophylaxis needed.
Conclusion
This study shows that hip
fracture is strongly associated with osteoporosis
and the level of femoral neck bone density that has
significant risk for hip fracture is 0.6333 gr/cm2.
Therefore, we recommend that prophylactic treatment
be started for every person screened by DXA who has
bone mineral density below 0.6333 gr/cm 2.
Also regular follow up by DXA is needed until BMD
reaches at least above 0.6333 gr/cm2.
|