|
Abstract:
Objectives: To determine the causes of
initiation and promotion of cannabis smoking
among local transport drivers of Peshawar.
Design,
Settings and Duration: A descriptive observational
study was conducted in the main wagon and bus
stop in city, Haji camp bus stop and roadway
house Hashtangri, from October 2004 to September
2005.
Methods:
A questionnaire was designed in accordance with
the objectives of the study. Relevant information
was recorded from the respondents on the pre-designed
questionnaire.
Results:
A total of 400 smoker drivers were included.
Of the total 181 (45.25%) were cannabis/marjuana
smokers. The age range of the cannabis smokers
was from 16 years to 65 years of age with mean
age of 35.5 years. The distribution of smoking
habits recorded was: cigarette smoking alone
19%, snuffing 23%, cannabis smoking 42.25%,
heroin and cannabis smoking 3%. Out of the total
cannabis smokers 43% were illiterate and 40%
had primary education. Forty three percent had
more than ten pack-years of cannabis smoking.
The reason for exposure of the respondents was:
to compensate fatigue 39.21%, influence from
friends 31.49%, parents were smokers 11.6%,
pleasure from smoking 8.83%. Ninety percent
agreed that cannabis is easily available to
them. Fifty seven percent had a poor social
background. Thirty four percent had faced road
accidents. The effect of cannabis on respondents
was: lack of interest 36.46%, decreased memory
19%, depression 16%, sedation 5.52%. Maximum
number of the respondents (19.33%) wanted to
quit cannabis smoking.
Conclusion:
Cannabis smoking is common in local transport
drivers. The major causes that are involved
in the initiation and progression of cannabis
smoking are; driving in young age, poverty,
lack of education, easy availability of cannabis,
influence from colleagues and smoker parents.
Key
word: cannabis smoking, drivers, Peshawar.
|
Introduction
Cannabis is the derived
flowering top of the hemp plant, cannabis sativa.
It contains the euphoric element, tetrahydrocarbinole
as well as cannabinol and canabiniol. It is classified
as a hallucinogenic. It is prepared as bhung, majun,
hashish, marijuana, charas and ganja.(1)
Smoking is a major risk factor for coronary artery
diseases and lung diseases. According to a WHO report,
percentage of people aged 18 year and above, in Pakistan,
who smoke is 3.8% offemales, 15 - 30% of males.(2)
It is well documented that cannabis is the main psychoactive
substance detected in the blood of drivers suspected
of driving under the influence of psychotropic drugs.(3)
Smoking of marijuana is significantly associated with
chronic bronchitis (cough and phlegm), but it has
not been firmly established whether it also leads
to a reduction in lung function.(4)
British drug control
laws were in force in Pakistan until February 1979
when the President of Pakistan promulgated the Prohibition
(Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979. Under this Order
more severe penalties are prescribed for those who
violate the regulations of import, export, manufacture
or processing of any intoxicants, the term which refers
mainly to products of cannabis, opiates and coca derivatives.
The Prohibition Order, 1979 and the Dangerous Drugs
Act 1930 were amended in December 1983 to provide
for further increases in punitive sanctions for offenders
violating drug control laws and even more severe sanctions
for offenders who are recidivists.(5)
The present study was
therefore designed to determine the causes of initiation
and promotion of cannabis smoking among local transport
drivers of Peshawar.
Patients and methods
A descriptive observational
study was conducted in the main wagon and bus stop
in city, Haji camp bus stop and roadway house Hashtangri,
from October 2004 to September 2005.
A total of 400 smoker drivers were included. Of the
total 181 (45.25%) were cannabis smokers. Only cannabis
smokers were further studied.
Inclusion criteria were all
smokers who smoke cannabis in cigarettes/or any other
ways. Heroin addicts, only cigarette smokers with
no cannabis added, those who were snuffing naswars,
and intravenous drug users, were all excluded from
the study.
A detailed history of the
respondents was taken with the help of a pre-designed
questionnaire, prepared in accordance with the objectives
of this study. Family history smoking was also recorded
from each client. The questionnaire contained preliminary
information regarding age, sex, address and education
of the respondents. It also contained information
about causes of initiation and promotion of cannabis
among local transport drivers in Peshawar.
Finally statistical analysis
of the data was performed and association of risk
factors with cannabis smoking was studied.
Results
Sampling:
A total of 400 smoker drivers were included. Of the
total 181 (45.25%) were cannabis/marjuana smokers.
Only cannabis smokers were studied in detail.
Age range:
The age range of the cannabis smokers was from 16
years to 65 years of age with a mean age of 35.5 years.
Education of the respondents:
Out of the total number of cannabis smokers 43% were
illiterate and 40% had primary education. Fifteen
percent had matriculated. (Table
1)
Smoking habits of the respondents:
The distribution of smoking habits recorded was: cigarette
smoking alone 19%, snuffing 23%, cannabis smoking
42.25%, heroin and cannabis smoking 3%. (Table
2)
Number of pack years of cannabis smoking:
Forty three percent had more than ten pack years of
cannabis smoking. (Table 2)
Exposure of the respondents to cannabis:
The exposure state of the respondents was: to compensate
fatigue 39.21%, influence from friends 31.49%, parents
were smokers 11.6%, pleasure to smoke 8.83%. (Table
3)
Effects of cannabis on health:
The effect of cannabis on respondents was: lack of
interest 36.46%, decreased memory 19%, depression
16%, sedation 5.52%. (Table 4)
Table
1: Characteristics of cannabis smokers:
Total number of the respondents = 181
|
Characteristics
of cannabis smokers: |
Number
of respondents |
Percentage
(%) of total |
|
1. Age wise distribution
of the respondents |
|
|
|
16 to 25
years |
41 |
22.65% |
|
26-35 years |
108 |
59.66% |
|
36 to 45
years |
24 |
13.25% |
|
More than
45 years |
8 |
44.19% |
|
2. Education of the respondents |
|
|
|
Illiterate |
79 |
43.64% |
|
Primary
education |
68 |
37.56% |
|
Matric education |
27 |
14.91% |
|
Secondary
education |
7 |
3.86% |
|
3. Number of pack years
of cannabis smoking |
|
|
|
1-5 years |
60 |
33.14% |
|
6-10 years |
78 |
43.09% |
|
11-15 years |
31 |
17.12% |
|
More than
15 years |
12 |
6.62% |
<back
to text
Table
2: Smoking habits of the respondents:
Total number of the respondents = 400
|
Smoking
habits of the respondents: |
Number of
the respondents |
Percentage
(%) of total |
|
Cigarette
smoking alone |
76 |
19% |
|
Cannabis
in smoking |
92 |
23% |
|
Snuffing |
169 |
42.25% |
|
Heroin and
cannabis in smoking |
12 |
3% |
|
Intravenous
drug users |
7 |
1.75% |
|
No smoking
habits |
44 |
11% |
<back
to text
Table
3: Exposure of the respondents to cannabis.
Total number of the respondents = 181
|
Exposure
of the respondents to cannabis |
Number of
the respondents |
Percentage
(%) of total |
|
To compensate
fatigue |
71 |
39. 22% |
|
Inspired
by friends |
57 |
31.49% |
|
Parents
are smokers |
21 |
11.60% |
|
For pleasure |
16 |
8.83% |
|
Accidentally |
10 |
5.52% |
|
Neglection
by family |
4 |
2.20% |
|
For style |
2 |
1.10% |
<back
to text
Table
4: Effect of cannabis on cannabis smoker:
Total number of the respondents = 181
|
1. Have you encountered an accident? |
Number of respondents |
Percentage (%) of total |
|
Yes |
62 |
34.25% |
|
No |
119 |
65.74% |
|
If
yes (total = 62) |
|
|
|
Minor accident |
38 |
61.29% |
|
Major accidents |
24 |
38.40% |
|
2. Effects of cannabis on health |
|
|
|
Lack of interest |
66 |
36.46% |
|
Decreased memory |
35 |
19.33% |
|
Depression |
29 |
16.02% |
|
Sedation |
10 |
5.52% |
|
Excitement |
2 |
1.10% |
|
No effect recorded |
39 |
21.54% |
|
3. Attitude of people towards you |
|
|
|
Do not know |
58 |
32.04% |
|
Discouraging |
107 |
59.11% |
|
Cooperative |
16 |
8.83% |
<back
to text
Table
5: Miscellaneous results about cannabis smokers:
Total number of the respondents = 181
|
Miscellaneous details about cannabis smokers |
Number of smokers |
Percentage of total (%) |
|
1. Availability of cannabis |
|
|
|
Easily available |
166 |
91.71% |
|
Not easily available |
16 |
8.29% |
|
2. Monthly income of smokers |
|
|
|
Less than 5000/month |
103 |
56.90% |
|
5-20,000/month |
65 |
35.91% |
|
> 20,000/month |
13 |
7.18% |
|
3. Do you want to quit? |
|
|
|
Yes |
165 |
91.11% |
|
No |
18 |
9.94% |
<back
to text
Discussion
The drug abuse control programme
in Pakistan is inter-disciplinary and progressive.
Its main thrust consists of constant vigilance on
border checkpoints by law enforcement agencies, developing
in-patient and outpatient facilities for treatment
and rehabilitation of addicted persons, and a preventive
education programme using the mass media and students
from higher educational institutions.(6)
In the present study the age
range of the cannabis smokers was from 16 years to
65 years of age with a mean age of 35.5 years. Similar
findings have been recorded from a study conducted
to examine the differences between addicted and non-addicted
university students on measures of home environment
and peer relations. Participants were 45 addicts and
45 non-addicts with mean ages of 23 years, drawn from
three Pakistani universities located in Islamabad,
Lahore, and Peshawar.(7) In our study
43% of the respondents were illiterate and 40% had
primary education. Knowledge of smoking is largely
associated with education, but opinions on tobacco
control are dependent on both smoking status and education.
The length of education was positively associated
with knowledge of smoking-related risks.(8)
The exposure state of the respondents was: to compensate
fatigue 39.21%, influence from friends 31.49%, parents
were smokers 11.6%, pleasure to smoke 8.83%. Frequently
reported reasons for smoking (eg. tension and craving)
and reasons for relapse (e.g. desire remained high,
withdrawal symptoms) were related to nicotine dependence.
Current female smokers scored higher on the modified
Beck Depression Inventory (0-3) than current male
smokers (p < 0.001). Oral health issues related
to tobacco use, such as gum disease and tooth staining,
were identified as factors that might motivate a quit
attempt.(9) In USA attendance at a tobacco
industry-sponsored event at a bar, nightclub, or campus
party was associated with a higher smoking prevalence
among college students. Promotional events may encourage
the initiation or the progression of tobacco use among
college students who are not smoking regularly when
they enter college.(10)
90% of our respondents agreed
that cannabis is easily available to them. Peshawar
is situated near to tribal areas as well as with Afghanistan.
These two areas are famous for cannabis corps. Illegal
smuggling from these areas might be responsible for
the increasing burden of cannabis smokers. In 1984
an estimated 85 per cent of hashish on the illicit
market in Canada originated in Lebanon (55 per cent
in 1983), 10 per cent in India or Pakistan (31 per
cent in 1983) and 5 per cent in Jamaica (2 per cent
in 1983).(11) The effect of cannabis on
respondents was: lack of interest 36.46%, decreased
memory 19%, depression 16%, sedation 5.52%. The long-term
use of cannabis, particularly at high intake levels,
is associated with several adverse psychosocial features,
including lower educational achievement and, in some
instances, psychiatric illness. There is little evidence,
however, that long-term cannabis use causes permanent
cognitive impairment, nor is there is any clear cause
and effect relationship to explain the psychosocial
associations.(12) Thirty four percent of
our respondents had faced road traffic accidents.
The prevalence of cannabis (3% is estimated) in the
driving population in France is similar to that for
alcohol (2.7%). At least 2.5% (1.5% to 3.5%) of fatal
crashes were estimated as being attributable to cannabis,
compared with 28.6% for alcohol (26.8% to 30.5%).
Driving under the influence of cannabis increases
the risk of involvement in a crash.(13)
Conclusion
From the data and discussion
we conclude that cannabis smoking is common in local
transport drivers. The major causes that are involved
in the initiation and progression of cannabis smoking
are; driving at a young age, poverty, lack of education,
easy availability of cannabis, influence from colleagues
and smoker parents.
|
References
| 1. |
Dorland
illustrated medical dictionary(2000). 28th edition.
W.B Saunders, London: 256. |
| 2. |
Judith M,
George AM (ed), 2004. The Atlas of Heart diseases
and Stroke. World health organization and CDC,
1st ed. the Han way press london.pp. 33. |
| 3. |
Giroud C
Augsburger M, Favrat B, Menetrey A, Pin MA, Rothuizen
LE et al(2006 May). Effects of oral cannabis and
dronabinol on driving capacity Ann Pharm Fr.;
64(3): 161-72. |
| 4. |
Pfeifer AK,
Lange P (2006 May 1). Pulmonary consequences of
marijuana smoking, [Article in Danish]. Ugeskr
Laeger.; 168(18):1743-6. |
| 5. |
Hussain
M(1984 Jul-Sep). Provisions in the laws of Pakistan
to combat serious drug-related offences. Bull
Narc; 36(3): 15-7. |
| 6. |
Zaidi SM,
Ashraf SM, Afridi AA(1982 Jan-Mar). Programme
development of drug abuse control in Baluchistan,
Pakistan. Bull Narc; 34(1): 23-6. |
| 7. |
Aziz S Shah
AA(1995 May). Home environment and peer relations
of addicted and non-addicted university students.
J Psychol; 129(3): 277-84. |
| 8. |
Nishi N,
Ogruii S, Onodoa T, Nohora M, Inoue H, Okayama
A (2005 Nov). Knowledge of smoking-related risks
and opinions on tobacco control by smoking status
and education level in Japan. Nippon Koshu Eisei
Zasshi; 52(11): 962-70. |
| 9. |
Ellison
J, Mansell C, Hoika L, Macdougall W, Gansky S,
Walsh M (2006 Spring). Characteristics of adolescent
smoking in high school students in California.
J Dent Hyg; 80(2): 8. Epub 2006 Apr 1. |
| 10. |
Rigotti NA,
Moran SE, Wechsler H (2005 Jan). US college students'
exposure to tobacco promotions: prevalence and
association with tobacco use. Am J Public Health;
95(1): 138-44.stam |
| 11. |
Stamller
RT, Fahlman RC, Vigeant H (1985 Oct-Dec). Illicit
traffic and abuse of cannabis in Canada. Bull
Narc; 37(4): 37-49. |
| 12. |
Iversen
L (2005 Feb). Long-term effects of exposure to
cannabis. Curr Opin Pharmacol; 5(1): 69-72. |
| 13. |
Laumon B,
Gadegbeku B, Martin JL, Biecheler MB(2005 Dec
10). Cannabis intoxication and fatal road crashes
in France: population based case-control study.
Br Med J; 331(7529): 1371. |
|