|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chief
Editor Past
issues
|
Feasibility of the Divided Attention Steering Simulator (DASS) for the Assessment of Vigilance in Stroke Patients Christine Roffe MD1 1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK. The research for this project
was performed in the Department of Geriatric Medicine of Keele University,
UK.
We are grateful for the support of the Novartis
Foundation for Gerontological Research who contributed to the salary of
one of the researchers. We are also grateful to Dr JO Davis of Stowood
Scientific Instruments, Oxford for technical support. We thank all the
patients and controls for their contribution to the study and the ward
staff for their support of the project. Funding Key words Background and purpose: Fatigue is
a common complication of stroke, but difficult to assess objectively,
since only few stroke patients can perform conventional vigilance tests
because of dysphasia, hemianopia or hemi-inattention. The purpose of this
study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of the Divided Attention
Steering Simulator (DASS), a computer simulated driving task for the assessment
of vigilance, in an unselected group of stroke patients. Conclusion:
The DASS could be performed by the majority of stroke patients, including
subjects with dysphasia and hemianopia/hemi-inattention. Tiredness
or fatigue is a common and disabling problem in patients recovering from
a stroke. Ingles et al reported a prevalence of self-reported fatigue
of 68% 3-13 months after the stroke in community dwelling individuals.
In 40% fatigue was rated as the worst or one of their worst symptoms after
the stroke (1). Its causes are likely to be multifactorial,
and include the size and location of the brain lesion, cerebral blood
flow, metabolic and environmental factors (2-5). Tiredness
impairs attention, mood and mental flexibility (6) and can
make rehabilitation difficult or even impossible. There is an association
between the ability to maintain sustained attention early after stroke
and functional status at 2 years (7). Tiredness, and its effect on performance, can be assessed by vigilance tests. These assess the ability of the individual to sustain and focus attention. Typically stimuli (strings of letters, shapes or numbers) are presented over a period of time with instructions to the subject to indicate when the target stimulus is perceived (8). The Test of Everyday Attention (9) includes a five minute tone counting test (The Elevator Counting test), an auditory vigilance task (the Lottery test) and a visual search task (Telephone Search) (9). Perhaps the simplest vigilance test is the Osler test (10) which requires the subject to press a button each time a light flashes. All of these tests, however, require at least basic language skills to understand the instructions, and thus dysphasic subjects are usually excluded from clinical studies (7,11). The only data on vigilance after stroke are thus derived from relatively unimpaired patient population. With currently available tests it is not possible to assess vigilance reliably in unselected stroke patients. The Divided Attention Steering Simulator (DASS) is a vigilance test commonly used in the assessment of sleep apnoea and narcolepsy (12-15). In a computer simulated driving situation subjects are instructed to steer a vehicle using a remote steering wheel with button controls down a winding road shown on the computer monitor. This test has the potential to be used in a wide range of patients with stroke. The driving situation is obvious, and dysphasic patients may be able to 'have a go' using non-verbal instructions. Patients with hemianopia or hemi-inattention may be able to use the road margin in the unaffected visual field to track the position of the vehicle (16). For patients with hemiparesis the steering wheel was adapted to have bilateral controls, so that it could be handled using the unaffected hand only. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted DASS in patients recovering from a stroke. Methods The protocol was approved by the North Staffordshire Research Ethics Committee. Written informed consent obtained from all competent and non-dysphasic participants. Assent from the next of kin was accepted for dysphasic non-competent patients. Subjects Controls The Divided Attention
Steering Simulator test Test Protocol Assessments Statistics Results Baseline demographic data Thirty-nine stroke patients were approached during the two months of recruitment. Of these 3 were excluded for medical reasons and 3 refused consent. Thirty-three patients were recruited. The mean age was 73.8 SD 7.6 years, 21 (64%) were males. The mean time from stroke onset was 8.9 SD 5.4 weeks. All had cerebral infarcts on CT head scan. Thirty (91%) had hemiparesis, 15 (45%) had hemianopia, 14 (42%) had tactile hemi-inattention and 6 (18%) were dysphasic. There were 11 (33%) total anterior circulation strokes (TACS), 14 (42%) partial anterior circulation strokes, 8 (24%) lacunar strokes (LACS) and 0 posterior circulation strokes (POCS). Twenty-seven (82%) had previous driving experience. Twenty-four controls were recruited. They
were well matched for age (mean age 72.5 SD 7.2 years), sex (52% males)
and driving experience (80% were drivers). Twenty (83%) completed the
full 20 minutes, one was timed out after 12 min and three abandoned the
test prematurely. Results of the DASS DASS results for all stroke patients and controls are described fully in table 1. Stroke patients performed significantly worse in all test categories than controls. Within the stroke group test results were
not related to age or time since stroke onset (correlation coefficients
-0.16-0.24). Table
2 shows the effect of different patient characteristics
on test performance. Six of the patients included in the study were dysphasic.
Their results showed a trend towards a lower performance with the number
of off road events per hour being significantly greater (p=0.05). Fifteen
patients included in the study had hemianopia. These patients had a greater
standard deviation from the road (p=0.02) and more off road events per
hour (p=0.04) than patients without hemianopia. The 14 patients with tactile
hemi-inattention had a greater standard deviation from the road (p=0.02)
than those without. Patients with a lacunar syndrome had better test results
than those with a partial or total anterior circulatory syndrome (p=0.03
for standard deviation from the road and p=0.04 for response time). Vigilance is an important factor for the success of rehabilitation. Fatigue is common after stroke, and may be worsened by drug treatment for stroke related problems such as incontinence, depression and insomnia. Vigilance testing is difficult in stroke patients because of weakness of the dominant hand, problems with understanding instructions in dysphasic patients and problems of perception in the affected visual field in patients with hemianopia or hemi-inattention. Thus, assessment of vigilance in stroke patients relies heavily on clinical observation, which is subjective and difficult to quantify. The results of this study show that the Divided Attention Steering Simulator test can be completed by the majority of unselected stroke patients resident on a rehabilitation ward, even by those who were dysphasic or had no prior experience of driving. Furthermore, most of the subjects tested found the experience enjoyable. In this population of older individuals age and prior driving experience did not significantly affect test results. However, performance of both stroke patients and controls is worse than those of previously published normal control groups, which were taken from a much younger population (14). As expected for a group of subjects with neurological problems, stroke patients performed worse than age and sex matched controls for all test parameters. Within group comparisons amongst the stroke patients showed that test performance in subjects with more extensive strokes (e.g. anterior circulation syndromes rather than lacunar syndromes), dysphasia, hemianopia, hemi-inattention, and dysphasia had slightly worse test results than those with less neurological deficits. While some of the comparisons yielded significant p-values, the differences within the stroke group were much less than the difference between stroke patients and controls. Few targets were recognised by any of the patients (21%) and reaction time was slow (8.8 s). Most patients were unable successfully to divide their attention between tracking and cue recognition. The target recognition aspect of the test depends on the patients' ability to understand verbal instructions and to see the whole screen. This part of the test was, therefore, less useful in stroke patients, but still provided some baseline data which could be used to monitor changes over time within one individual. The adapted version of the Divided Attention Steering Simulator test described here could be performed by most stroke patients, and the experience was enjoyable in the majority of subjects. It thus has the potential to become an important tool in the assessment of vigilance in this patient group. The 'Divided Attention' aspect of the test produces limited data in stroke patients. A simplified test, with an easier road, slower driving speed or concentrating on tracking alone should be explored in future studies. References
|
November
2004 Blood RNA concentration in Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia Serum Zinc and Copper Concentration in Human-Age related cataract The likelihood of being helped versus being harmed: useful in geriatric treatment dilemma's Feasibility of the Divided Attention Steering Simulator (DASS) for the Assessment of Vigilance in Stroke Patients The European Nursing Academy for Care of Older persons (ENACO) Middle-East Academy for Medicine of Ageing, third session of the first course Urogenital atrophy in climacteric women: Menopause or Geripause? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||