|
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To
determine if I/A Methotrexate is effective in
rheumatoid arthritis.
Material and methods: this study was conducted
in medical B unit of Postgraduate Medical Institute,
Lady Reading hospital and a private rheumatology
clinic in Peshawar.
A total of 40 rheumatoid
arthritis patients who were resistant to I/A steroids
were included in the study. At first visit 12.5
mg of intra-articular Methotrexate with lignocaine
was injected with aseptic technique. Twenty eight
patients completed follow up and again 12.5 mg
I/A Methotrexate was given. Clinical improvement
was assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS)
and parameters like pain, swelling, flexion and
ESR. Patients with septic joints, sepsis around
the joint, I/A steroids within last three months
and bleeding disorders were excluded from the
study.
Results: A total
of 28 patients completed two follow ups, one for
re-injection and the other for response analysis.
Eighteen (64.3%) were females and 10 (35.7%) males.
The age range was from 40 to 50 years with mean
age of 45.9643 +3.21 SD years. No response was
received from 11 patients, 6 females and 5 males,
with VAS 10/10 for pain and swelling, flexion
up to 30 degree and ESR>60mm/hr. Partial response
was recorded in 11 patients 7 females and 4 males,
with VAS 5-10/10 for pain and swelling, flexion
30-90 degree and ESR 41-60mm/hr. Good response
(VAS 0-4 /10 for pain and swelling) was noted
in 6 patients with flexion >90 degree and ESR
20-40mm/hr.
Conclusion: Our
study response rate was 6/28 (21.42%) which is
encouraging; besides our patients received only
two injections of I/A MTX and results were much
better than as reported in a very few studies
from abroad. It is the first ever study on I/A
Methotrexate from NWFP and probably from Pakistan.
Key words: I/A
Methotrexate, response, Peshawar.
|
INTRODUCTION
Based on visual observation,
the ancients characterized inflammation by five cardinal
signs, namely redness (rubor), swelling (tumour), heat
(calor; only applicable to the body's extremities),
pain (dolor) and loss of function (functio laesa). The
first four of these signs were named by Celsus in ancient
Rome (30-38 B.C.) and the last by Galen (A.D 130-200).
More recently, inflammation
was described as "the succession of changes which
occurs in a living tissue when it is injured, provided
that the injury is not of such a degree as to at once
destroy its structure and vitality" , or "the
reaction to injury of the living microcirculation and
related tissues 1. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic,
systemic autoimmune disorder that causes the immune
system to attack the joints, where it causes inflammation
(arthritis) and destruction. It can also damage some
organs, such as the lungs and skin. It can be a disabling
and painful condition, which can lead to substantial
loss of functioning and mobility. It is diagnosed with
blood tests (especially a test called rheumatoid factor)
and X-rays2. Diagnosis and long-term management are
typically performed by a rheumatologist, an expert in
the diseases of joints and connective tissues3.
Various treatments are available.
Non-pharmacological treatment includes physical therapy
and occupational therapy. Analgesia (painkillers) and
anti-inflammatory drugs, as well as steroids, are used
to suppress the symptoms, while disease-modifying anti-rheumatic
drugs (DMARDs) are often required to reverse the disease
process and prevent long-term damage. In recent times,
the newer group of biologics has increased treatment
options3. I/A steroid injections are commonly used for
acute painful joints. A meta-analysis supports the recommendations
of American and international authorities that I/A injection
of corticosteroids provides short-term relief of the
pain. I/A corticosteroids result in a clinically and
statistically significant reduction in knee pain 1 week
after injection that continues for 3 to 4 weeks4, 5.
Cortisone therapy has offered relief in the past, but
its long-term effects have been deemed undesirable6.
However, cortisone injections can be valuable adjuncts
to a long-term treatment plan, and using low dosages
of daily cortisone (e.g., prednisone or prednisolone,
5-7.5 mg daily) can also have an important benefit if
added to a proper specific anti-rheumatic treatment.
Still there are some cases that are resistant to intra-articular
steroids and international data has recently shown that
Methotrexate has been tried intra-articularly and has
shown its effectiveness as reported in various trials
7-10.
The present study was a continuation
of the recently conducted trial to see the effectiveness
of I/A Methotrexate.
METHODS
A total of 40 rheumatoid arthritis
patients who were resistant to I/A steroids were included
in the study. Twenty eight patients completed twice
follow up one for re injection and other for response
analysis. Eighteen (64.3%) were females and 10 (35.7%)
males. The age range was from 40 to 50 years with mean
age of 45.9643 +3.21 SD years. Proper informed consent
was taken from all the respondents.
Inclusion criteria were all
rheumatoid arthritis patients with single knee joint
involvement, not responding to I/A steroids. While exclusion
criteria were all patients with septic joints, sepsis
around the joint, I/A steroids within last three months
and bleeding disorders. After proper selection of patients,
at first visit 12.5 mg intra-articular Methotrexate
with lignocaine was injected with aseptic technique.
Twenty eight patients completed follow up and again
12.5 mg I/A Methotrexate was given. Combination with
lignocaine was aimed to increase the volume of the drug
to cover more joint space. Twenty eight patients completed
follow up and again 12.5 mg I/A Methotrexate alone was
given. Clinical improvement was assessed with parameters
of pain, swelling, flexion and ESR. Visual analogue
scale was used for pain analysis. A Visual Analogue
Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to
measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed
to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily
be directly measured. For example, the amount of pain
that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from
none to an extreme amount of pain. It asks the patient
how severe is your pain right now, as shown in the Figure
1.
Figure
1

No pain agonizing
pain11.
Swelling and joint flexion was clinically assessed and
swelling was also weighted on VAS. ESR was done in all
visits and compared. Both readings were noted on a specially
designed proforma prepared in accordance with the objective
of the study.
Furthermore our trial was in accordance with CONSORT
(consolidated standard of reporting trials) trial guidelines
and its flow chart was as follows:
Flow chart of the trial
based on CONSORT trial guidelines12:
Figure 2

Finally data collected was entered
in SPSS11 version and was analyzed in frequency, median
mode statistics for age and sex parameters and cross
tabulation analysis was done for pain, swelling, flexion
and ESR.
RESULTS
A total of 28 patients completed
two follow up visits, one for re-injection and the other
for response analysis. Eighteen were females and 10
males (Table 1). The age range was from 40 to 50 years
with mean age of 45.96 +3.21 SD years (Table 2). Visual
analogue scale (VAS) analysis was used to see the response
along with clinical examination and ESR. No response
was received from 11 patients, (6 females and 5 males)
with VAS 10/10 for pain and swelling, flexion up to
30 degree and ESR>60mm/hr. Partial response was recorded
in 11 patients (7 females and 4 males), with VAS 5-10/10
for pain and swelling, flexion 30-90 degree and ESR
41-60mm/hr. Good response (VAS 0-4 /10 for pain and
swelling) was noted in 6 patients with flexion >90
degree and ESR 20-40mm/hr. Flexion, swelling and sex
cross tabulation clinically elicited response analysis
of patients is shown in Table 3. Reduction in ESR improvement
in pain that was orally explained by patient and recorded
in terms of percentage improvement is shown in Table
4.
Table 1 Sex wise distribution
of patients
|
Sex |
Number of patients |
Percentage % |
| Males |
10 |
35.71 |
| Females
|
18 |
64.28 |
Table 2 Age Statistics of patients
| Total
number of the respondents |
28 |
| Mean |
45.9643 |
| Median |
46.0000 |
| Mode |
50.00 |
| Std.
Deviation |
3.21434 |
| Range |
10.00 |
| Minimum |
40.00 |
| Maximum |
50.00 |
Table 3 Flexion, swelling and
sex cross tabulation clinically elicited response analysis
of patients
|
Sex |
SWELLING (clinically assessed and then presented
on VAS) |
Total |
| |
|
VAS score 10/10 |
VAS score 5-10/10 |
VAS score 0-4/8 |
|
|
Males |
FLEXION |
Flexion
up to 30 degree |
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
Flexion 30-90 degree |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
Flexion more than 90 degree |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
Total |
5 |
4 |
1 |
10 |
|
Females |
FLEXION |
Flexion up to 30 degree |
6 |
|
|
6 |
|
Flexion 30-90 degree |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
Flexion more than 90 degree |
|
|
4 |
4 |
|
Total |
6 |
8 |
4 |
18 |
Table 4 ESR 'Pain' Sex -Cross
Tabulation response analysis
|
Sex |
Pain |
Total |
| |
|
VAS score 10/10 |
VAS score 5-10/10 |
VAS score 0-4/8 |
|
|
Males |
ESR |
20-40
mm/ hr |
|
|
1
|
1 |
|
41-60 mm/ hr |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
> 60 mm/ hr |
5
|
|
|
5 |
|
Total |
5 |
4 |
1 |
10 |
|
Females |
ESR |
20-40 mm/ hr |
|
|
4 |
4 |
|
41-60 mm/ hr |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
> 60 mm/ hr |
6
|
|
|
6 |
|
Total |
6 |
8 |
4 |
18 |
DISCUSSION
There is no cure for rheumatoid
arthritis. Treatment for rheumatoid arthritis aims to
reduce inflammation in joints in order to relieve pain
and prevent or slow joint damage. Clinical results from
trials conducted on I/A Methotrexate support the hypothesis
that Methotrexate may be used intra-articularly as an
immuno-suppressor rather than at the heavily toxic doses
required for a cytostatic effect. Furthermore repeated
intra-articular injections of MTX results in a decrease
of local as well as systemic inflammatory signs in RA
8,13. Intra articular MTX therapy results in a strong
decrease of SF-granulocyte counts. This effect may be
due to the impairment of IL-8 mediated chemotaxis by
decreased IL-8 synthesis in synovial fluid mononuclear
cells 14. Our patients received two injections in a
dose of 12.5mg of MTX one month apart but still the
response was satisfactory. In another study patients
with definite RA and knee effusions under constant doses
of DMARD therapy were treated with up to 6 intra-articular
injections of 10 mg Methotrexate (MTX) every 3 to 7
days14. Iagnocco A, et al9 treated his patients with
intra-articular injections of MTX 10 mg every 7 days
for 8 weeks. Hence with a disciplined dosage and proper
follow up a much better response can be achieved. But
as it was the first ever attempt here it was not properly
arranged. In the present study visual analogue scale
(VAS) analysis was used to see the response along with
clinical examination and ESR. Iagnocco A, et al9 also
assessed the response of MTX I/A therapy through clinical
evaluation measuring maximal knee flexion angle, visual
analog scale (VAS) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate
(ESR).
Ultrasonographic examination
of the involved knee was performed to see synovial thickness
in the suprapatellar bursa and the presence of joint
effusion and Baker's cyst. We observed that no response
was received from 11 patients (6 females and 5 males)
with VAS 10/10 for pain and swelling, flexion up to
30 degree and ESR>60mm/hr. Partial response was recorded
in 11 patients (7 females and 4 males), with VAS 5-10/10
for pain and swelling, flexion 30-50 degree and ESR
41-60mm/hr. Good response (VAS 0-4 /10 for pain and
swelling) was noted in 6 patients with flexion >50
degree and ESR 20-40mm/hr. Iagnocco A et al9 also concluded
that repeated intra-articular injections of MTX resulted
in a decrease of local as well as systemic inflammatory
signs. But Gao IK et al14 reported that repeated intra
articular MTX therapy results in a worse 13 week outcome
than I/A. steroid treatment measured in an intention-to-treat
analysis. As far as we know, this is the first study
reported from NWFP that explores the effects of intra-articular
MTX in RA clinically.
Further studies are encouraged
to prove effects of intra-articular MTX in RA by ultrasonograhy
of joints. Our study has reported 28 cases with I/A
MTX which are far greater than many trials that that
have reported on IA Methotrexate around the world 8,
9, 10, 14 etc.
CONCLUSION
Our study response rate was
6/28 (21.42%) which is encouraging; besides our patients
received only two injections I/A MTX and this was much
better than as reported in a very few studies from abroad.
It is the first ever study on
I/A Methotrexate from NWFP and probably from Pakistan
as we have searched on pubmed, pakmedinet, and Google
search. Furthermore we reported moreof cases than have
so far been published in literature.
REFERENCES
- Punchard NA, Whelan CJ, Adcock I. The Journal of
Inflammation (Editorial). Journal of Inflammation
2004, 1:1.
- Majithia V, Geraci SA. "Rheumatoid arthritis:
diagnosis and management". Am. J. Med. 2007;120
(11): 936-9.
- Landré-Beauvais AJ. "The first description
of rheumatoid arthritis. Unabridged text of the doctoral
dissertation presented in 1800". Joint Bone Spine
2001; 68 (2): 130-43. PMID 11324929.
- Balch HW, Gibson JM, El-Ghobarey AF, Bain LS, Lynvh
MP. Repeated corticosteroid injections into knee joints.
Rheumatol Rehabil 1977; 16(3): 137-40.
- Raynauld JP, Buckland-Wright C, Wald R, Choquette
D, Haraoui B, Martel-Pelletier J, et al. Safety and
efficacy of long-term intraarticular steroid injections
in osteoarthritis of the knee. A randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:370-7.
- O'Dell J (). "Therapeutic strategies for rheumatoid
arthritis". N Engl J Med 2004; 350 (25): 2591-602.
- Hall GH, Jones BJ, Head AC, Jones VE. I/A methotrexate.
Clinical and laboratory study in rheumatoid and psoriatic
arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978; 37(4): 351-6.
- Hasso N, Maddison PJ, Breslin A. I/A methotrexate
in knee synovitis. Rheumatology 2004; 43: 779-782
- Iagnocco A, Cerioni A, Coari G, Ossandon A, Masciangelo
R, Valesini GI/A methotrexate in the treatment of
rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: a clinical
and sonographic study. Clin Rheumatol. 2006; 25(2):
159-63
- Blyth T, Stirling A, Coote J, Land D, Hunter JA.
injection of the rheumatoid knee: does I/A methotrexate
or rifampicin add to the benefits of triamcinolone
hexacetonide? Br J Rheumatol. 1998; 37(7): 770-2.
- Wewers M.E. & Lowe N.K. A critical review of
visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical
phenomena. Research in Nursing and Health 1990;13:
227-236.
- Rennie D. How to report a clinical trial, the consort
statement. Journals of American medical association,
1996; 276:649.
- Franchi F, Seminara P, Codacci-Pisanelli G, Aronne
T, Avella A, Bonomo LIntrarticular methotrexate in
the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. Recenti Prog
Med. 1989 ;80(5):261-2.
- Gao IK, Leins C, Bohlen H, Heilig B, Lemmel EM.Inhibition
of interleukin-8 synthesis by intraarticular methotrexate
therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Z Rheumatol.
1998 ; 57(2):95-100
|