|
Mr. Andrew Bates
is a sixty-six-year old man who you have been managing for almost twenty
years. For most of that time you have known him to be hypersensitive and,
despite your best efforts, his BP control has been 'Average'. His most recent
BP was 155/95, despite two agents. Andrew has also been a smoker but you
did convince him to stop about five years ago. He also required a 'statin'
for cholesterol control in recent years.
Andrew comes
in requesting a 'thorough going over' as his brother recently died from
an AMI. You decide to check his renal function amongst his investigations
and to your surprise his serum creatinine is 210 umol/? (0.21 mmol/L)
[normal <120 umol/L].
You have
no record of a previous level.
| 1.
Question |
Answer |
|
You
decide to follow this up with some further tests. Which of the following
would be useful:
Click
on the above items for feedback
|
MSU
Urine dipstick
ECG
A repeat U&E's, Cr
|
We determine
that Andrew has stable renal impairment, with a serum creatinine on repeat
testing of 205 umol/L.
A dipstick
showed only +protein and no blood and a follow-up MSU was unremarkable.
The ECG showed some latheral T wave incersion consistent with 'ischaemia
or a strain pattern'.
| 2.
Question |
Answer |
|
You
decide to image his
kidneys.
Which ONE is the best test?
Click
on the above items for feedback
|
Renal
ultrasound
|
The kidneys
are a little small (right 9.5 cm, left 9 cm) but there is no other abnormality
found. It appears likely that Andrew has chronic renal impairment with
no reversable component. A Nephrologist feels that he has advanced nephrosclerosis
(the not so beginning of the end of the spectrum of benign nephrosclerosis)
as a result of his long history of hypertension and other vascular risk
factors. He has been advised that his kidneys will continue to deteriorate
over the next 3-6 years, at which point he will probably need dialysis.
|
| 3.
Question |
Answer |
|
What
are the factors that will influence his rate of progression over
the next few years?
Select
one only.
Click
on the above items for feedback
|
Tight
blood pressure control
|
As Andrew’s
renal failure progresses he will also need attention to the following
factors.
Control
of calcium and phosphate
High phosphate levels may cause itch but more importantly will slowly
cause deterioration in Andrew's bones with the developement of 'renal
osteodystrophy'. Control of phosphate with phosphate binders such as calcium
carbonate and the later introduction of calcitriol are likely to be needed.
Control
of anaemia
Most patients
with renal failure develop anaemia (except for about half of the patients
with polycystic kidneys). This is usually not related to levels of iron,
B12 or folate, although deficiencies of these need to be excluded. Usually
this anaemia responds to erythropoietin (or EPO) therapy. EPO is given
as a subcutaneous injection, once or twice a week and the patients nearly
always require supplemental iron therapy, often even intravenous iron
therapy, due to the high induced levels of red cell production. Correcting
the anaemia improves many of the symptoms of advanced renal failure and
may help protect the heart from left ventricular hypertrophy.
Ongoing
control of his blood pressure, diet and lipids.
Deterioration
in BP control can quickly translate into a rapid decline in renal function.
Preparation
for dialysis, and if appropriate, transplantation (probably not in this
case)
Preparation
for dialysis involves an extensive education programme, construction of
an AV fistula in the forearm, and maintenance of otherwise good general
health. Poorly controlled ischaemic heart disease in particular makes
dialysis difficult.
Once on dialysis,
Andrew has a mortality rate of about 13-16% per year (or about 15-20 deaths
per 100 patient years). This figure is much higher if he happens to have
diabetes.
|
|
MSU
An
MSU would be quite useful. In the circumstance of newly discovered
renal impairment it is important to determine whether there is evidence
for glomerulonephritis (GN), and further whether this is likely
to be an acute aggressive form of glomerulonephritis. GN remains
the most common cause of chronic renal failure in Australia. If
there are no (glomerular) red cells in the urine, then rapidly progressive
GN would be unlikely. Most forms of severe GN exhibit high numbers
of glomerular red cells in the urine, often with red cell casts.
Causes
of Renal Failure - Australia 1999
Source: ANZDATA Report, 2000

%
percent
<
back to question/ answer
|
|
24-Hour
urine creatinine
A 24-hour
urine creatinine falls short of the mark! Whenever ordering a 24-hour
urine, request 'creatinine clearance' and not just 'creatinine'.
The latter will only give you the creatinine excretion, which is
relatively unhelpful. A creatinine clearance (which requires a synchronous
blood creatinine level) will provide details of the renal function,
at least in terms of the glomerular filtration rate. A well-muscled
man of 66 would be expected to have a creatinine clearance (CrCl)
of one third of normal or less with a serum creatinine of 210 umol/l.
A CrCl is a far better way of documenting the renal function in
mild renal impairment than a simple serum creatinine, as it changes
in a linear fashion with the changing renal function (click here
to see figure) N.B.: Whilst ordering a 24-hour urine, its best to
also ask for a 'protein excretion' to determine the total protein
excretion in 24 hours. This is a more useful test than the albumin
excretion rate in this setting.
Non-linear
relationship of serum creatinine level to renal function. The dotted
line indicates the upper limit of normal serum creatinine.

Linear
relationship between creatinine clearance and renal function.

<
back to question/ answer
|
|
Urine
dipstick
A urine
dipstick will quickly tell you whether there is significant proteinuria
or haematuria. Many forms of renal disease will exhibit some proteinuria,
however, advanced nephrosclerosis (which Andrew may have) may only
have low-grade proteinuria, e.g. + on dipstick.
<
back to question/ answer
|
|
ECG
An
ECG may actually be quite useful. Andrew is a likely candidate for
vascular disease (family history, smoker, cholesterol, hypertension)
and the presence of silent ischaemic heart disease may be a clue
to renovascular disease. This is usually a small vessel problem
within the kidney, manifest as slowly progressive renal failure
without urinary protein or red cells, usually with hypertension
and other vascular disease. It is different from large vessel 'renal
artery stenosis'.
ECG
Report:
The ECG shows LVH consistent with hypertension.
<
back to question/ answer
|
| Autoantibody
screen
An
autoantibody screen would not be particularly useful as most auto-immune
diseases are uncommon at this age. There is one particular auto-immune
disease which is relatively common in this setting, this being small
vessel vasculitis also called microscopic polyangitis. This could
be the case with Andrew if there were red cells in the urine. A
specific antibody test needs to be ordered (ANCA antibodies) and
this is not usually included in the standard 'autoantibody screen'
|
|
A
repeat U&E's, Cr
A repeat
U & E's, Cr is useful, especially to determine whether there
is deteriorating renal function or whether the serum creatinine
is stable at its current level. The electrolytes may give a hint
as hyperkalaemia is more common with acute deterioration and renal
artery stenosis may cause hypokalaemia. There is always the chance
that the initial result is a 'lab error' but this is certainly grasping
at straws!
<
back to question/ answer
|
|
Renal
ultrasound
Ultrasound
is probably the best test in this circumstance. It provides an assessment
of renal size, as most causes of chronic renal failure are associated
with small kidneys - the exceptions being polycystic kidneys and
sometimes diabetes. Ultrasound also excludes (or diagnoses) obstruction
very well (Click here to view Figure). Obstruction is important
in this setting as even late relief of obstruction may result in
significant improvement in renal function. Scars, e.g. from past
reflux nephropathy, can often be seen. Ultrasound does not provide
any functional assessment but also is not interfered with by poor
renal function and is non-invasive.
<
back to question/ answer
|
|
IVP
An
IVP is unlikely to be particularly useful. With the impaired renal
function it is likely that there will only be a poor nephrogram
phase and the ureterogram phase may not be seen at all. Some advise
giving a double dose of contrast to overcome some of these problems
but it must be remembered that this increases the risk of contrast
induced acute renal failure.
<
back to question/ answer
|
| CT
scan
A CT
scan of the abdomen may be useful. Renal size will be able to be
determined and obstruction can be diagnosed. However, a CT is a
relatively expensive and invasive test when an ultrasound is likely
to provide a similar degree of information.
<
back to question/ answer
|
|
Nuclear
scanning
Nuclear
scanning (Technetium-DTPA renal scan) may provide some useful information.
It is not particularly useful for determining morphology (size and
shape, scars etc) but provides good information on function. Nuclear
scanning can differentiate function from one side to the other,
thus providing 'split renal function'. A nuclear scan is the best
non-angiographic test for diagnosing functional renal artery stenosis,
especially when performed as a pre and post-captopril study.
99m
Technetium-DTPA renal scan
 |
Pre-
captopril |
| Post-captopril |
(Source-
Dr Kym Bannister, Director of Nephrology, Royal Adelaide Hospital)
<
back to question/ answer
|
| Renal
ultrasound and Doppler
Adding
Doppler to a routine ultrasound provides information on vascular
flow, especially renal artery flow. Thus if renal artery stenosis
is suspected, a Doppler may be useful to diagnose this. Unfortunately,
Doppler studies have a lower hit rate than nuclear studies as they
are influenced by body habitus and the experience of the operator.
In addition, Doppler can only demonstrate the presence of a stenosis
and give an indication of the degree of anatomical stenosis but
it cannot indicate the degree of functional stenosis (remembering
that we are not seeing a 3D reconstruction of the stenosis).
<
back to question/ answer
|
| A
strict low-protein diet
Low-protein
diets have been through several phases. Low-protein diets certainly
reduce the symptoms of more advanced renal failure (or more specifically
'uraemia') but will not have such benefit for Andrew. The average
Australian diet contains 1-1.5 gm/kg of protein per day. Restricting
this to about 0.7 gm/kg day may well help slow the rate of progression
of his renal failure (Click here to view Figure). However, a prolonged
period of time on a low-protein diet, especially if not closely
supervised, may result in some degree of malnutrition and thus moderate
protein restriction only is usually recommended (e.g. 0.8 gm/kg/day).
With more advanced renal impairment, patients often autorestrict
their protein intake via a loss of appetite.
Renal
Function vs Time

In
most renal conditions renal function deteriorates at a steady rate.
The use of antihypertensives and to a lesser extent, low protein
diets, slows this rate of deterioration.
<
back to question/ answer
|
| Total
avoidance of salt
Avoidance
of salt is a useful adjunct to BP control. How far do you go? Patients
should be warned that it takes at least 4-6 weeks to become accustomed
to a very low salt diet. If this is tolerated, well and good, but
many patients end up eating very little under this restriction and
are probably better off eating some salt. It should also be remembered
that some renal conditions result in salt (and water) wasting, especially
predominantly tubular disorders such as analgesic nephropathy and
reflux nephropathy (whereas the glomerular disorders tend to retain
salt and water). A diuretic may be an alternative to a low salt
diet.
<
back to question/ answer
|
|
Tight blood pressure control
There
is no question that tight blood pressure control is very important
(Click here to view Figure). We have known for some time that the
rate of progression of renal failure due to most renal diseases
is slowed by blood pressure control. Recent trials have confirmed
this and suggested even tighter margins with lower target blood
pressures. Target levels close to 120-130/80-85 should be kept in
mind.
Renal
Function vs Time

In
most renal conditions renal function deteriorates at a steady rate.
The use of antihypertensives and to a lesser extent, low protein
diets, slows this rate of deterioration.
<
back to question/ answer
|
| Absolute
requirement for an ACE-Inhibitor
ACE-Inhibitors
appear to offer benefit over and above simple blood pressure control,
compared to other antihypertensive agents. Having said this some
recent trials have suggested that if blood pressure control is tight
then the differences are less and that other antihypertensive agents
(especially beta-blockers) may offer equal benefits. Most nephrologists
currently prefer to use ACE-Inhibitors as a first choice but accept
other agents as good alternatives if ACE-Inhibitors can't be used
(e.g. due to renal artery stenosis, rising creatinine, hyperkalaemia,
drug reactions, cough). Angiotensin-II receptor blockers may offer
similar benefits to ACE-Inhibitors but there is not enough data
available yet to confirm this.
<
back to question/ answer
|
| Maintaining
a low cholesterol
Maintaining
a low cholesterol is probably beneficial. This issue has not been
addressed in a large-scale manner specifically in terms of rate
of progression of renal failure. However, we know that progression
is at least in part related to intra-renal haemodynamics and the
state of the intra-renal vasculature. Diminishing any deterioration
in the state of these vessels will be helpful and so the nephrologists
have 'borrowed' these concepts from the cardiologists. Exact target
levels have not been defined but prudence suggests that a total
cholesterol below 5.0 mmol/l would be wise.
<
back to question/ answer
|
|