ISSN 1449-8677  

December 2005
Volume 2,
Issue 3

Table of contents:

From the editor

Editorial

Meet the team
Dr Sijmen Arend
Duursma

Original Contribution/Clinical Investigation
Increased leukocyte
rigidity in the elderly

Parkinson's disease
and related movement disorders

Models and Systems
of Elderly Care
Study of Relation
between Knowledge,
Attitude and Practice
of the Elderly with
Their General Health in
Tehran

Education and
Training
Renal Failure

Conference
5th European
Congress of
Biogerontology


Abdulrazak Abyad MD,
MPH,
MBA, AGSF

Editorial office:
Abyad Medical Center &
Middle East Longevity
Institute
Azmi Street, Abdo Center,
PO BOX 618
Tripoli, Lebanon
Phone: (961) 6-443684
Fax: (961) 6-443685
Email:
aabyad@cyberia.net.lb






Lesley Pocock
medi+WORLD International
572 Burwood Road,
Hawthorn 3122
AUSTRALIA
Phone: +61 (3) 9819 1224
Fax: +61 (3) 9819 3269
Email:
lesley@mediworld.com.au

Renal Failure


Mr. Andrew Bates is a sixty-six-year old man who you have been managing for almost twenty years. For most of that time you have known him to be hypersensitive and, despite your best efforts, his BP control has been 'Average'. His most recent BP was 155/95, despite two agents. Andrew has also been a smoker but you did convince him to stop about five years ago. He also required a 'statin' for cholesterol control in recent years.

Andrew comes in requesting a 'thorough going over' as his brother recently died from an AMI. You decide to check his renal function amongst his investigations and to your surprise his serum creatinine is 210 umol/? (0.21 mmol/L) [normal <120 umol/L].

You have no record of a previous level.

1. Question Answer

You decide to follow this up with some further tests. Which of the following would be useful:

Click on the above items for feedback

MSU
Urine dipstick
ECG
A repeat U&E's, Cr

We determine that Andrew has stable renal impairment, with a serum creatinine on repeat testing of 205 umol/L.

A dipstick showed only +protein and no blood and a follow-up MSU was unremarkable. The ECG showed some latheral T wave incersion consistent with 'ischaemia or a strain pattern'.

2. Question Answer

You decide to image his
kidneys.
Which ONE is the best test?

Click on the above items for feedback

Renal ultrasound

The kidneys are a little small (right 9.5 cm, left 9 cm) but there is no other abnormality found. It appears likely that Andrew has chronic renal impairment with no reversable component. A Nephrologist feels that he has advanced nephrosclerosis (the not so beginning of the end of the spectrum of benign nephrosclerosis) as a result of his long history of hypertension and other vascular risk factors. He has been advised that his kidneys will continue to deteriorate over the next 3-6 years, at which point he will probably need dialysis.

3. Question Answer

What are the factors that will influence his rate of progression over the next few years?

Select one only.

Click on the above items for feedback

Tight blood pressure control

As Andrew’s renal failure progresses he will also need attention to the following factors.

Control of calcium and phosphate
High phosphate levels may cause itch but more importantly will slowly cause deterioration in Andrew's bones with the developement of 'renal osteodystrophy'. Control of phosphate with phosphate binders such as calcium carbonate and the later introduction of calcitriol are likely to be needed.

Control of anaemia
Most patients with renal failure develop anaemia (except for about half of the patients with polycystic kidneys). This is usually not related to levels of iron, B12 or folate, although deficiencies of these need to be excluded. Usually this anaemia responds to erythropoietin (or EPO) therapy. EPO is given as a subcutaneous injection, once or twice a week and the patients nearly always require supplemental iron therapy, often even intravenous iron therapy, due to the high induced levels of red cell production. Correcting the anaemia improves many of the symptoms of advanced renal failure and may help protect the heart from left ventricular hypertrophy.

Ongoing control of his blood pressure, diet and lipids.
Deterioration in BP control can quickly translate into a rapid decline in renal function.

Preparation for dialysis, and if appropriate, transplantation (probably not in this case)
Preparation for dialysis involves an extensive education programme, construction of an AV fistula in the forearm, and maintenance of otherwise good general health. Poorly controlled ischaemic heart disease in particular makes dialysis difficult.

Once on dialysis, Andrew has a mortality rate of about 13-16% per year (or about 15-20 deaths per 100 patient years). This figure is much higher if he happens to have diabetes.

MSU

An MSU would be quite useful. In the circumstance of newly discovered renal impairment it is important to determine whether there is evidence for glomerulonephritis (GN), and further whether this is likely to be an acute aggressive form of glomerulonephritis. GN remains the most common cause of chronic renal failure in Australia. If there are no (glomerular) red cells in the urine, then rapidly progressive GN would be unlikely. Most forms of severe GN exhibit high numbers of glomerular red cells in the urine, often with red cell casts.

Causes of Renal Failure - Australia 1999
Source: ANZDATA Report, 2000


% percent

< back to question/ answer

24-Hour urine creatinine

A 24-hour urine creatinine falls short of the mark! Whenever ordering a 24-hour urine, request 'creatinine clearance' and not just 'creatinine'. The latter will only give you the creatinine excretion, which is relatively unhelpful. A creatinine clearance (which requires a synchronous blood creatinine level) will provide details of the renal function, at least in terms of the glomerular filtration rate. A well-muscled man of 66 would be expected to have a creatinine clearance (CrCl) of one third of normal or less with a serum creatinine of 210 umol/l. A CrCl is a far better way of documenting the renal function in mild renal impairment than a simple serum creatinine, as it changes in a linear fashion with the changing renal function (click here to see figure) N.B.: Whilst ordering a 24-hour urine, its best to also ask for a 'protein excretion' to determine the total protein excretion in 24 hours. This is a more useful test than the albumin excretion rate in this setting.

Non-linear relationship of serum creatinine level to renal function. The dotted line indicates the upper limit of normal serum creatinine.

Linear relationship between creatinine clearance and renal function.

< back to question/ answer

Urine dipstick

A urine dipstick will quickly tell you whether there is significant proteinuria or haematuria. Many forms of renal disease will exhibit some proteinuria, however, advanced nephrosclerosis (which Andrew may have) may only have low-grade proteinuria, e.g. + on dipstick.

< back to question/ answer

ECG

An ECG may actually be quite useful. Andrew is a likely candidate for vascular disease (family history, smoker, cholesterol, hypertension) and the presence of silent ischaemic heart disease may be a clue to renovascular disease. This is usually a small vessel problem within the kidney, manifest as slowly progressive renal failure without urinary protein or red cells, usually with hypertension and other vascular disease. It is different from large vessel 'renal artery stenosis'.
ECG Report:
The ECG shows LVH consistent with hypertension.

< back to question/ answer

Autoantibody screen

An autoantibody screen would not be particularly useful as most auto-immune diseases are uncommon at this age. There is one particular auto-immune disease which is relatively common in this setting, this being small vessel vasculitis also called microscopic polyangitis. This could be the case with Andrew if there were red cells in the urine. A specific antibody test needs to be ordered (ANCA antibodies) and this is not usually included in the standard 'autoantibody screen'

A repeat U&E's, Cr

A repeat U & E's, Cr is useful, especially to determine whether there is deteriorating renal function or whether the serum creatinine is stable at its current level. The electrolytes may give a hint as hyperkalaemia is more common with acute deterioration and renal artery stenosis may cause hypokalaemia. There is always the chance that the initial result is a 'lab error' but this is certainly grasping at straws!

< back to question/ answer

 

Renal ultrasound

Ultrasound is probably the best test in this circumstance. It provides an assessment of renal size, as most causes of chronic renal failure are associated with small kidneys - the exceptions being polycystic kidneys and sometimes diabetes. Ultrasound also excludes (or diagnoses) obstruction very well (Click here to view Figure). Obstruction is important in this setting as even late relief of obstruction may result in significant improvement in renal function. Scars, e.g. from past reflux nephropathy, can often be seen. Ultrasound does not provide any functional assessment but also is not interfered with by poor renal function and is non-invasive.

< back to question/ answer

IVP

An IVP is unlikely to be particularly useful. With the impaired renal function it is likely that there will only be a poor nephrogram phase and the ureterogram phase may not be seen at all. Some advise giving a double dose of contrast to overcome some of these problems but it must be remembered that this increases the risk of contrast induced acute renal failure.

< back to question/ answer

CT scan

A CT scan of the abdomen may be useful. Renal size will be able to be determined and obstruction can be diagnosed. However, a CT is a relatively expensive and invasive test when an ultrasound is likely to provide a similar degree of information.

< back to question/ answer

Nuclear scanning

Nuclear scanning (Technetium-DTPA renal scan) may provide some useful information. It is not particularly useful for determining morphology (size and shape, scars etc) but provides good information on function. Nuclear scanning can differentiate function from one side to the other, thus providing 'split renal function'. A nuclear scan is the best non-angiographic test for diagnosing functional renal artery stenosis, especially when performed as a pre and post-captopril study.

99m Technetium-DTPA renal scan

Pre- captopril
Post-captopril

(Source- Dr Kym Bannister, Director of Nephrology, Royal Adelaide Hospital)

< back to question/ answer

Renal ultrasound and Doppler

Adding Doppler to a routine ultrasound provides information on vascular flow, especially renal artery flow. Thus if renal artery stenosis is suspected, a Doppler may be useful to diagnose this. Unfortunately, Doppler studies have a lower hit rate than nuclear studies as they are influenced by body habitus and the experience of the operator. In addition, Doppler can only demonstrate the presence of a stenosis and give an indication of the degree of anatomical stenosis but it cannot indicate the degree of functional stenosis (remembering that we are not seeing a 3D reconstruction of the stenosis).

< back to question/ answer

 

A strict low-protein diet

Low-protein diets have been through several phases. Low-protein diets certainly reduce the symptoms of more advanced renal failure (or more specifically 'uraemia') but will not have such benefit for Andrew. The average Australian diet contains 1-1.5 gm/kg of protein per day. Restricting this to about 0.7 gm/kg day may well help slow the rate of progression of his renal failure (Click here to view Figure). However, a prolonged period of time on a low-protein diet, especially if not closely supervised, may result in some degree of malnutrition and thus moderate protein restriction only is usually recommended (e.g. 0.8 gm/kg/day). With more advanced renal impairment, patients often autorestrict their protein intake via a loss of appetite.

Renal Function vs Time

In most renal conditions renal function deteriorates at a steady rate. The use of antihypertensives and to a lesser extent, low protein diets, slows this rate of deterioration.

< back to question/ answer

Total avoidance of salt

Avoidance of salt is a useful adjunct to BP control. How far do you go? Patients should be warned that it takes at least 4-6 weeks to become accustomed to a very low salt diet. If this is tolerated, well and good, but many patients end up eating very little under this restriction and are probably better off eating some salt. It should also be remembered that some renal conditions result in salt (and water) wasting, especially predominantly tubular disorders such as analgesic nephropathy and reflux nephropathy (whereas the glomerular disorders tend to retain salt and water). A diuretic may be an alternative to a low salt diet.

< back to question/ answer

Tight blood pressure control

There is no question that tight blood pressure control is very important (Click here to view Figure). We have known for some time that the rate of progression of renal failure due to most renal diseases is slowed by blood pressure control. Recent trials have confirmed this and suggested even tighter margins with lower target blood pressures. Target levels close to 120-130/80-85 should be kept in mind.

Renal Function vs Time

In most renal conditions renal function deteriorates at a steady rate. The use of antihypertensives and to a lesser extent, low protein diets, slows this rate of deterioration.

< back to question/ answer

Absolute requirement for an ACE-Inhibitor

ACE-Inhibitors appear to offer benefit over and above simple blood pressure control, compared to other antihypertensive agents. Having said this some recent trials have suggested that if blood pressure control is tight then the differences are less and that other antihypertensive agents (especially beta-blockers) may offer equal benefits. Most nephrologists currently prefer to use ACE-Inhibitors as a first choice but accept other agents as good alternatives if ACE-Inhibitors can't be used (e.g. due to renal artery stenosis, rising creatinine, hyperkalaemia, drug reactions, cough). Angiotensin-II receptor blockers may offer similar benefits to ACE-Inhibitors but there is not enough data available yet to confirm this.

< back to question/ answer

Maintaining a low cholesterol

Maintaining a low cholesterol is probably beneficial. This issue has not been addressed in a large-scale manner specifically in terms of rate of progression of renal failure. However, we know that progression is at least in part related to intra-renal haemodynamics and the state of the intra-renal vasculature. Diminishing any deterioration in the state of these vessels will be helpful and so the nephrologists have 'borrowed' these concepts from the cardiologists. Exact target levels have not been defined but prudence suggests that a total cholesterol below 5.0 mmol/l would be wise.

< back to question/ answer